12 is a multiple of 2.
yes 2x4=8 4x2=8 or 2x6=12 3x4=12 No, but any multiple of 2 is a multiple of 4. For example, 26 is a multiple of 2 (x13) but NOT a multiple of 4 (4x6=24; 4x7=28).
102x5=10
Yes, 438 is a multiple of 2. A number is a multiple of another number if it can be divided evenly by that number without leaving a remainder. In this case, 438 can be divided by 2 evenly, as 438 divided by 2 equals 219 with no remainder. Therefore, 438 is a multiple of 2.
The LCM of 2 and 12 is 12. Because 12 is a multiple of 2, it is automatically the LCM of the pair.
What is a multiple of 2 and 3?A multiple of 2 and 3 is 6.
Any multiple of 4 is also a multiple of 2.
No, but 30 is a multiple of 2.
No, 8 is a multiple of 2.
No. To get a multiple of 2, multiply 2 by something. 2x6 is 12, so 12 is a multiple of 2. No matter what you multiply 2 by, you will never get 1, so 1 is not a multiple of 2.
No, but vice versa holds true. Case and point: 6 is a multiple of 2, but not a multiple of 4. 8 is a multiple of 4, and is a multiple of 2. Because a factor of 4 is 2, every multiple of 4 is also a multiple of 2. But since 4 is not a factor of 2, rather, only half of it, only half of the multiples of 2 will be multiples of 4.
231,230 is a multiple of 2
12 is a multiple of 2.
Sure. 2 is a multiple of 1 and itself.
I'm pretty sure you mean a "multiple" of 2 .2 is a multiple of 2 . . . the 'first multiple'.If my assumption is incorrect, I offer my apology.
No. To be a multiple of 6, it must pass both the tests for being a multiple of 2 and 3. To be a multiple of 2, the number must be even; 9283 is odd, so is not a multiple of 2 and so it not a multiple of 6.
it is 4,4 is a multiple of 4 by 1and4 is a multiple of 2 by 2