No
30.
18 and 30 are both divisible by 1, 2, 3, 6. 18 and 30 both divide into 90, 180, 270, 360, 450, ...
The number 30 is the smallest whole number divisible by both 10 and 6.
They are both divisible by two.
30 is divisible by 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 10, 15, and 30.
30.
No. The smallest number divisible by both 5 and 2 is their lowest common Multiple (LCM) which is 10; ALL multiples of their LCM are divisible by 5 and 2, ie 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, ... are all divisible by 5 and 2.
18 and 30 are both divisible by 1, 2, 3, 6. 18 and 30 both divide into 90, 180, 270, 360, 450, ...
30, 60, 90...
Not always because 30 is divisible by 2 and 6 but not by 12
No. Both are divisible by 5.No. Both are divisible by 5.No. Both are divisible by 5.No. Both are divisible by 5.
30
One way to work it out in your head is to consider than 30 is divisible by 3, so you can ask if 140 is divisible by 30. It's not, since 14 is not divisible by 3. If the number was 129 or 159, both of those are divisible by three since both 12 and 15 are divisible by 3.
Your question is impossible to answer. Any number that is divisible by both 2 and 5 will also be divisible by 10. 30 and 60 are not divisible by 9.
No, a number that is divisible by 10 will not always be divisible by 4. For a number to be divisible by 10, it must end in 0. However, for it to be divisible by 4, the last two digits of the number must form a number that is divisible by 4. For example, the number 30 is divisible by 10 but not by 4, as 30 divided by 4 does not yield an integer.
'30' Because 30/ 2 = 15 30/ 3 = 10 30 / 5 = 6
The number 30 is the smallest whole number divisible by both 10 and 6.