No. But it is divisible by: 1 2 3 6 71 142 213 and 426.
Yes. 426/6 = 71
It is because 186426 = 3*62142 and 186426 = 9*20714.
it is but it comes out 106.5 which is uneven so probably not
81: 8 + 1 = 9 which is divisible by 9, so 81 is divisible by 9 162: 1 + 6 + 2 = 9 which is divisible by 9, so 162 is divisible by 9 199: 1 + 9 + 9 = 19 → 1 + 9 = 10 → 1 + 0 = 1 which is not divisible by 9, so 199 is not divisible by 9. 1125: 1 + 1 + 2 + 5 = 9 which is divisible by 9, so 1125 is divisible by 9. So 199 is the only one not divisible by 9.
No. But it is divisible by: 1 2 3 6 71 142 213 and 426.
Yes. 426/6 = 71
No, it is clearly a multiple of 2, making it not a prime number.
Yes.
1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 18, 71, 142, 213, 426, 639, 1278
Yes as both divisible by 3 so 15/426 = 5/142
It is because 186426 = 3*62142 and 186426 = 9*20714.
Well, honey, let's do some math here. The sum of the digits in 847 is 8+4+7=19, which is not divisible by 9. So, no, 847 is not divisible by 9. But hey, nice try for thinking about divisibility!
it is but it comes out 106.5 which is uneven so probably not
1,098 is divisible by 2 and 3. But im not sure about 6 and 9. But 5 and 10 are NOT divisible! I had this on my math homework!Study Link 1-5!
yes - 91 times 9 is 819. It would be worth your while to learn how to divide by 9- ask your math teacher for a lesson.
Oh, dude, let me break it down for you. So, 666 is divisible by 3 because if you add up the digits (6+6+6), you get 18, which is divisible by 3. But when it comes to 9, well, 666 isn't divisible by 9 because the sum of its digits (6+6+6) is 18, not a multiple of 9. Math can be a trip, man!