0
the maximum speed an animal can walk in feet per second is s = 5.7 to the power of l where l is the animals leg length in feet what is the maximum walking speed for a camel with a leg length o 5.7 feet?
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is a repeating decimal number irrational?
no
What is a number that cannot be expressed as a repeating or terminating decimal?
An irrational number.
Is 5.75 repeating a rational number or irrational?
It is a rational number.
What is the definition for a non-repeating decimal?
That's an irrational number.
Does square root of 13 divided by 625 have a terminating decimal or a non-terminating decimal?
-612
Is -0.575 an irrational number?
No An irrational number goes on forever with no repeating pattern.
Is a repeating decimal number irrational?
no
Is 5.25 repeating an irrational number?
No, it is not.
Is 4.15 a repeating rational number?
A repeating rational number is an irrational number. An irrational number is an number that has no definite end. 4.15 has a definite end and is therefore a rational number.
Can an irrational number be written as a repeating number or terminating?
No.
Is 4.13 repeating rational number or irrational number?
It is a rational number because it can be expressed as a fraction.
Is a repeating number an irrational number?
Not necessarily. An irrational number is one that cannot be expressed as a simple fraction. But such numbers as one-third (rational) is also a repeating number (0.3333333r).
How can you tell what numbers are irrational?
A number is said to be irrational if the number is non -repeating and non-terminating.
Can an irrational number be written as a repeating number or terminating decimal?
No.
What type of decimal is an irrational number?
An irrational number has a decimal representation that is non-terminating and non-repeating.
Is the square root of 51 irrational?
yes, it is irrational. An irrational number can defined as a number that can not be expressed as a finite nor a repeating decimal.
Is 0.3 repeating an irrational number?
nope, its rational.
