Point negative absolute infinity
No. Integers are positive and negative whole numbers (…, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, …). As there are an infinite number of negative integers as they approach negative infinity (the greatest negative integer being -1), there can be no smallest (negative) integer.
Yes. Multiplying a negative number by a very large positive number will equal a large negative number. If you have the function y = -x, then as x approaches infinity, y will approach negative infinity at the same rate.
You could say -9 or 0 for the smallest, depending on whether you want to include negative numbers or not. 9 would be the largest one digit number.
Yes and no. Technically, infinity cannot be negative because it is an idea, not a number, but negative infinity is used in several mathematical equasions
Point negative absolute infinity
the number line goes up to infinity on both negative and positive sides
The set of negative integers is {-1, -2, -3, ...}. The greatest negative integer is -1. From there the numbers progress toward negative infinity. There are an infinite number of negative integers as they approach negative infinity. So there is no smallest negative integer. -1
The arrows at the ends of a number line indicate that the line extends forever in both directions (i.e. towards positive infinity and negative infinity)...since there is no largest or smallest real number.
A palindromic number can have as few as one digit, and as many as infinity. The smallest palindromic number is zero and the largest is '999... to infinity'.
This is the same as asking "What is the largest prime number?". The answer would be infinity, but infinity isn't a number. There is no answer. Maybe you meant to ask: "What is the SMALLEST prime number greater than 200?". The answer to that is 211.
No, there isn't, because for every positive number x you find, you have x+1 which will be bigger. This will be the same for every negative number y: y-1 will be smaller. You do however have infinity and -infinity, which are bigger respectively smaller than any number. But they are generally not considered as numbers themselves.
No. Integers are positive and negative whole numbers (…, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, …). As there are an infinite number of negative integers as they approach negative infinity (the greatest negative integer being -1), there can be no smallest (negative) integer.
An integer is a whole number. So zero could be the smallest integer.
Negative infinity plus one.
45825
I guess that the smallest would be zero, if you don't consider negative numbers. There is no largest palindromic number - you can make them as large as you like.