No Q is not cyclic under addition.
Chat with our AI personalities
It is rational.Any number that has a digit, or group of digits, that repeat forever is rational.
If you mean to continue the pattern indefinitely, adding more digits, and one more "1" in every cycle, then it is NOT rational. In the case of a rational number, the EXACT SAME group of digits has to repeat over and over (perhaps after some other, initial, digits), for example:0.45113113113113113... Here, the group of digits "113" repeats over and over, so the number is rational.
Suppose x is a rational number and y is an irrational number.Let x + y = z, and assume that z is a rational number.The set of rational number is a group.This implies that since x is rational, -x is rational [invertibility].Then, since z and -x are rational, z - x must be rational [closure].But z - x = y which implies that y is rational.That contradicts the fact that y is an irrational number. The contradiction implies that the assumption [that z is rational] is incorrect.Thus, the sum of a rational number x and an irrational number y cannot be rational.
A decimal is rational if it:either ends and doesn't go on forever; ORit is a repeating decimal.A decimal is irrational if it goes on forever and ever and never stops without repeating.The number: 5.77777777 is rational because it goes on forever, REPEATING the same number (the digit 7).It can also repeat a group of numbers, like the number: 8.789789789789789789See how the "789" is REPEATING over and over again and never stops? That is a rational decimal!
The discovery of the noble gases led to the addition of the group 0, which is also designated as group 18/VIIIA.