No.
noThis is incorrect..92 IS greater than .09592 hundredths is greater than 95 thousandths.
30.86
70 thousandths = 0.070 Although, its value is the same as 7 hundredths, 70 thousandths implies a greater degree of accuracy so the number SHOULD have a zero at the end.
1.02 - in terms of fractions, 1.006 is 1 and 6 thousandths, while 1.02 is 1 and 2 hundredths.
ml = "milli" thousandths of a litre cl = "centi" hundredths of a litre
.14 is greater than .027
14/100 is much greater than 27/1000
64 hundredths is greater because after 0 it us tenths hundredths then thousandths.
Greater.
The second one.
I think your question should be "Is 969 THOUSANDTHS (and not thousands) smaller than 96 hundredths" 969 thousandths = 969/1000 96 hundredths = 960 thousandths = 960/1000 Hence 969 thousandths is not smaller but greater tha 96 hundredths
Hundredths is greater. .01235 In this example, 0 is in the tenths place, 2 is in the hundredths, and 3 is in the thousandths. Hundredths is greater because it is closer to one. Yes, I'm in advanced math!
noThis is incorrect..92 IS greater than .09592 hundredths is greater than 95 thousandths.
5 hundredths is greater. Whether the numbers are written as decimals or fractions, or in some other base is totally irrelevant.
Eleven thousandths is greater than seven hundredths. To compare these two numbers, we need to convert them to the same unit. 700ths can be written as 0.07 (since 1/100 = 0.01), and 11 thousandths can be written as 0.011. Comparing 0.07 and 0.011, we see that 0.07 is greater than 0.011.
No because 1/000 is less than 1/100
30.86