Wiki User
∙ 13y agoWell, split 70 in half: 35 + 35. Add 4 (half of the 8) to one half: 39. Subtract 4 (the other half of 8) from the other half: 31. The smaller number is 31.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago31 31+39 = 70
70 - 8 = 62; 62/2 = 31 which is the smaller number; 31 + 8 = 39 which is the other number.
well first off, 0 means that there is nothing there or that your solution is equal to zero. if you have a negative number, then that number is officially smaller or now a lower number than zero because a negative number is of course smaller than a positive or neutral number like zero.
There is no such number. If you restrict yourself to integers, there are numbers - such as primes, that are not divisible by an integer other than one. And if you do not restrict yourself to intgers, then there is no smallest number sincce given any number, half that number will be smaller and will be a divisor.
number is 14 and the other is 56
The LCM of a set of numbers can never be smaller than the largest number in the set.
The smaller number of the two is 11. The other is 13.
The LCM is the larger number.
In that case, the smaller number is the GCF of the pair.
Only if that number is a factor of the other one.
It's the one number on the list for which half of the other numbers on the list are bigger than it is, and the other half of the numbers on the list are smaller than it is.
31
In the atoms on the periodic table the atomic number is the smaller of the two numbers, the other larger number is the mass umber
I suspect the answer you are looking for is an outlier.
The smaller number must be a third of the total, so the numbers are 13 & 26.
Neither.There are other numbers that are bigger or smaller.Neither.There are other numbers that are bigger or smaller.Neither.There are other numbers that are bigger or smaller.Neither.There are other numbers that are bigger or smaller.
When one number is a multiple of the other, the greatest common factor of the two is the smaller number.