The two square roots are +70 and -70 .
The two square roots of 18 are: 4.242641 and -4.242641
+6 and -6 are the square roots of 36.
4x**2-3x-5 quadratic = (-b+sqrt(b**2-4ac))/2a quadratic = (-b-sqrt(b**2-4ac))/2a b**2-4ac>0 --> 2 roots b**2-4ac=0 --> 1 root b**2-4ac<0 --> 0 roots (-3)**2-4(4*-5) 9+80=89 2 roots = (6+89**0.5)/8, (6-89**0.5)/8
+12 and -12
sqrt(89) = -9.4 or +9.4 So one possible pair of consecutive integers between the square roots of 89 are 2 and 3.
The square roots of 4 are -2 and 2.
square inches do not have square roots only number have square roots.
The two square roots are +70 and -70 .
The two square roots of 18 are: 4.242641 and -4.242641
+6 and -6 are the square roots of 36.
The two square roots of 4 are 2 and -2. Both {2,-2} when squared, equal positive 4.
No. The square roots of 2, 3 and 5, for a start, are not rational.
It is sqrt(2/3)
4 has two square roots. They are +2 and -2.
Rounded to five decimal places, sqrt(89) = ±9.43398The square root of 89 (written √89 or 891/2) = 9.434 (3dp)
No. Lots of square roots are not rational. Only the square roots of perfect square numbers are rational. So for example, the square root of 2 is not rational and the square root of 4 is rational.