They are the set of Natural numbers.
It means they have no common factors. This term is really only useful for integers, preferably positive integers.
This may or may not be true. The set of "counting numbers" may either be defined as all positive integers (1, 2, 3, 4...) or as all non-negative integers (0, 1, 2, 3, 4...). Similarly, the set of "whole numbers" may be defined as all positive integers, all non-negative integers, or as all integers (...-3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3...). It all depends on the definition given for each term.
use this formula: S=(N/2)(F+L) S= the sum of the first 100 positive even integers N= the number of terms F= first term L=last term Since we are using the first 100 positive integers we will replace "N" with 100. so it will look like this : S=(100/2)(F+L) Next we must substitute the "F" with the first positive term which is the number 2. So now it looks like this: S=(100/2)(2+L) We use the number 2 because our positive integers are 2,4,6,8,10,12...... you get the picture. Now we must substitute the "L" with the last positive term which is 200. As you probably guessed it will look like this: S=(100/2)(2+200) We use the number 200 because it is the last positive even integer. If we used 202 then that would have meant we used the 101th positive even integer and we don't want to do that. == == We should solve the numbers inside the parenthesis first. S=(100/2)(2+200) 100 divided by 2 = 50 So: S=50(2+200) 2+200=202 That means: S=50(202) 50 x 202 = 10,100 Finally: S=10,100 There you go! Wasn't that easy? Note: This formula only works if you are looking for the sum of the first 100 positive or negative, even or odd integers. It sucks cause this formula is the Bomb right? Oh well
The term whole number is used by various authors to mean either: * the nonnegative integers (0, 1, 2, 3, ...) * the positive integers (1, 2, 3, ...) * all integers (..., -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, ...) So, depending on the definition used in the text you are using, it would either be* 0 * 1 * negative infinity
It is a rational number.
the collective term for a positive integers and zero is
Absolute value * * * * * Counting numbers.
Integer is a mathematical term to define the set of whole numbers both positive and negative
There's no collective term for a group of echidnas.
The sum of the first forty positive integers can be calculated using the formula for the sum of an arithmetic series, which is (n/2)(first term + last term) where n is the number of terms. In this case, the sum is (40/2)(1 + 40) = 820.
It means they have no common factors. This term is really only useful for integers, preferably positive integers.
all number can be negative or positive. :) The term "whole numbers" is ambiguous; sometimes it is used for integers, sometimes only for non-negative integers. It is better to use the more precise terms "integers", "positive integers", "non-negative integers", depending on what you want to say. it is also false if your looking for this answer caue it could be like 0.3,0.5 there not whole numbers
A non-positive integer is any integer that is less than or equal to zero. This includes all negative integers (such as -1, -2, -3, etc.) as well as zero itself. In mathematical notation, non-positive integers are represented as { ..., -3, -2, -1, 0 }.
Forests, is the collective term for groups of treed vegetation.
The collective term for a group of tortoises is a "creep."
Unfortunately, the term "whole numbers" is somewhat ambiguous - it means different things to different people. If you mean "integers", yes, it is closed. If you mean "positive integers" or "non-negative integers", no, it isn't.
Natural numbers are the same as counting numbers, but the term positive numbers means something else. Natural or counting numbers are positive integers, but the category of positive numbers includes both integers and fractions, as long as they are greater than zero.