2005
In modern day notation of Roman numerals MCMLXIII is the equivalent of 1963 but the ancient Romans would have probably expressed it quite differently
It is: 205 = CCV in Roman numerals
We do use Roman numerals today. For example, Roman numerals are often found in making outlines; to label book chapters; to label the frontmatter (pages) in books.
The Roman numerals for 64 are ILXV (65-1) or LXIIII (64) and they are not LXIV. So your question is: What is the cube root of LXIIII in Arabic numerals? The answer is 4 which is IIII or IV in Roman numerals.
For these numerals to make any sense arrange them in descending order like this: CLLLX which can be simplified to CCLX (260)
In Roman numerals, 120 is represented as CXIX. This is broken down as C (100) + X (10) + IX (9). The Roman numeral system is additive, meaning that smaller values are added to larger values to create the desired number.
Those Roman Numerals mean 1991.
it means 1,150 in roman numerals
988 = CMLXXXVIII in Roman numerals
Not a valid sequence for Roman numerals
It does not mean anything because it is an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals
"D" in Roman Numerals equals 500.
In Roman numerals, it means N M C.
Roman numerals don't have a 0 symbol and so it is an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals
1837 is the equivalent of MDCCCXXXVII in Roman numerals
mcmxcvii means 1997 in roman numerals.