there is no length or width of a circle. There is radius and circumference and the line that goes all the way through the center to the other side of the circle, which is twice the radius. But there is no length or width of a circle.
After looking at several sites the rugs were all describe by the shorter(width) first.
Assuming Width <= Length then the width can be any positive value less than sqrt(270) feet = 16.43 feet (approx). Width = 15 ft goes with Length = 270/15 = 18 feet Width = 10 ft with Length = 270/10 = 27 ft Width = 0.0001 ft with Length = 270/0.0001 = 2700000 ft etc.
It is 2*(Length + Width).
(width side of the rectangle + length side of the rectangle) divided by 2
No it only goes to the width
length
there is no length or width of a circle. There is radius and circumference and the line that goes all the way through the center to the other side of the circle, which is twice the radius. But there is no length or width of a circle.
Plane
After looking at several sites the rugs were all describe by the shorter(width) first.
you cant, the length cant be found with a formula or anything: you can have a rectangle with a width of 7 and length of 5 w of 6 l of 5 it goes on forever there is no defined width with the length of five; no offense but this question shouldn't be on here
No it only goes to the width
No it only goes to the width
Volume = Length x Width x Height. If the prism is square, then either Height = Width or Height = Length In the first case, Volume = Length x Width2 and so Width = sqrt(Volume/Length) and Height = Width. In the second case, Volume = Length2 x Width and so Width = Volume/Length2 and Height = Length.
It makes absolutely no difference which way you list them, justas long as you clearly identify which number is which dimension.
It doesn't matter but Length * Width * Height is usually how people say it :D
Width should always be first.