Yes,Because not all disjoint no equivalent other have disjoint and equivalent
Not necessarily. For a counterexample, A and C could be the same set.
Joint sets:Joint sets are those which have common elements Disjoint sets : A pair of sets is said to be disjoint if their intersection is the empty set. That is to say, if they share no elements. All of the usual operations can be performed on disjoint sets, so long as the operation makes sense. (For example, taking the complement of one with respect to the other could pose problems.)
You cannot: whole numbers and improper fractions are disjoint sets.
A rule that specifies that an instance of a supertype may not simultaneously be a member of two (or more) subtypes
Multiply the possible outcomes of the events in the disjoint events
Two events are disjoint if they cannot occur together. In set terms, their intersection is a null set.
No.
no
Complements or complementary events
Two sets are considered disjoint if they have no elements in common.
I asked this question so someone please help me in this question?
Yes,Because not all disjoint no equivalent other have disjoint and equivalent
Two sets are disjoint if there are elements that belong to both. Two sets are overlapping if there is at least one elements that belongs to both.
If two events are disjoint, they cannot occur at the same time. For example, if you flip a coin, you cannot get heads AND tails. Since A and B are disjoint, P(A and B) = 0 If A and B were independent, then P(A and B) = 0.4*0.5=0.2. For example, the chances you throw a dice and it lands on 1 AND the chances you flip a coin and it land on heads. These events are independent...the outcome of one event does not affect the outcome of the other.
Not necessarily. For a counterexample, A and C could be the same set.
Two sets are said to be "disjoint" if they have no common element - their intersection is the empty set. As far as I know, "joint" is NOT used in the sense of the opposite of disjoint, i.e., "not disjoint".