First, we'll start with the definition of a contraction mapping:
Given the metric space (B, d), with x and y Є B, and metric d(x, y) = |y - x|; a function f : B → B is a contraction if there exists some real number k < 1 such that,
d[f(x), f(y)] ≤ kd(x, y).
All that the above is saying is that |f(y) - f(x)| ≤ k|y - x|, or that the distance between y and x that's been scaled down by a factor of k, is greater than or equal to the distance between y and x after the function f has been acted on them. Even simpler; the distance between y and x is less after the function's acted on them than before it had. Hence, the term contraction.
Now, we'll introduce two new variables. Let δ = ε with ε > 0.
If d(x, y) < δ, then d[f(x), f(y)] ≤ kδ. Since k < 1 that means that d[f(x), f(y)] < ε.
Well, that's the definition of a continuous function at the point y, but since y is an arbitrary value, f is continuous on B.
Q.E.D.
Proof by contradiction is also known by its Latin equivalent, reductio ad absurdum.
The 1993 5 coin proof set sells for about $7.
45% The percentage of alcohol is always 1/2 of the proof.
A 2004-S annual proof set is worth: $70-$80.
If your proof set has 9 coins it is worth $15. If it has 5 state quarters it is worth $9. If it is a regular silver proof set it is worth $144.
a vertical line
Rational proof is governed by the rules of logic, considered by many to be the basis of good thinking. Testing ideas through the use of continuous questioning and thoughtful examination. Empirical proof is proof arising from careful observation of events in nature; proof that forms the basis for scientific discovery. Form of proof in both natural and social science, including sociology. An attempt to support or refute an idea on the basis of independent observation by many individuals. Linda
You can find the definition of the function, a statement about the function's values, and an inductive proof, in the Wikipedia article "Carmichael function", which I won't repeat here.
why doesn't wiki allow punctuation??? Now prove that if the definite integral of f(x) dx is continuous on the interval [a,b] then it is integrable over [a,b]. Another answer: I suspect that the question should be: Prove that if f(x) is continuous on the interval [a,b] then the definite integral of f(x) dx over the interval [a,b] exists. The proof can be found in reasonable calculus texts. On the way you need to know that a function f(x) that is continuous on a closed interval [a,b] is uniformlycontinuous on that interval. Then you take partitions P of the interval [a,b] and look at the upper sum U[P] and lower sum L[P] of f with respect to the partition. Because the function is uniformly continuous on [a,b], you can find partitions P such that U[P] and L[P] are arbitrarily close together, and that in turn tells you that the (Riemann) integral of f over [a,b] exists. This is a somewhat advanced topic.
The Liouville theorem states that every bounded entire function must be constant and the consequences of which are that it proves the fundamental proof of Algebra.
Yes, although there seems to be much confusion over this seemingly obvious fact. Allowing the user to "go ogle" whatever they want is the entire purpose of google's search engine.. How much more proof do you need?
An indirect proof is a proof by contradiction.
A proof of product is a proof of product.
The CEC says no to sealtite. It can be rigid with EYS seals, pyrotennax with explosion proof glands or teck cable with explosion proof glands. In Canada we use teck cable because of its flexibility and with the explosion proof glands it is good for Class 1 Division 1.
proof
paragraph proof
contradiction