This is actually a little bit tricky to work, without just trying numbers. The first answer is 58, however there are an infinite amount of correct answers. For example 118, 178, and 238 are the next correct answers in sequence. In fact, the general solution to this answer is:n = 58 + 60k, where k is just any positive integer (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ...)
In the equation n = 58 + 60k, the 60 comes from the fact that it is the least common multiple of 3, 4, 5, and 6. The 58 is a little harder to explain. Here is how to algebraic solve this. It involves the modulus operation, so you should be familiar with that before reading the steps on how to systematically solve this problem.
n = dk + r, where n is the answer, d is the number we are dividing by, k is some integer, and r is the remainder.
k will vary from each condition, so let a,b,c,d = some integer
If we rewrite these as a modulus we have (1 below corresponds to 1 above):
Now take one of the n terms and place it into a different modulus rewrite:
We'll use the first term (#1) and the second term (#2).
n = 3a + 1 AND n%4 = 2
( 3a + 1 ) % 4 = 2
For simplicity, let's make the remainder zero, instead of two.
( 3a + 1 - 2 ) % 4 = 2 - 2
3a - 1 % 4 = 0
We need the left hand side to be some multiple of 4 for this equation to hold true. If a = -1 (find -1 by trial and error)
3(-1) - 1 = -3 - 1 = -4, and -4%4=0 is true, so this value of a works
Let j = some integer
a = -1 + 4j (we can add any multiple of 4 to our solution)
Now we need to do the exact same thing with the second two conditions (terms #3 and terms #4):
n = 5c + 3 AND n%6 = 4
5c + 3 % 6 = 4
5c - 1 % 6 = 0
Once again, if we try c = -1, we end up with:
5(-1) - 1 % 6 = 0
-5 - 1 % 6 = 0
-6%6=0 which holds true
Let k be some integer
Therefore, c = -1 + 6k
Plug a back into it's orginial equation:
n = 3a + 1, where a = -1 + 4j
n = 3(-1 + 4j) + 1 = 12j - 2
And Plug c back into it's originial equation:
n = 5c + 3, where c = -1 + 6k
n = 5(-1 + 6k) + 3 = 30k - 2
Now we have:
n = 12j - 2
n = 30k - 2
We have to do the same process as above with the new terms:
n = 12j - 2 is the same as saying n%12=-2
However, that doesn't make since, so add a multiple of 12 to it
n%12=-2(+12)=10
We only have to convert on term to the modulus form, and plug the other form into it, just like before:
n%12=10 AND n = 30k - 2
30k-2%12=10
30k-12%12=0
because 12 is just a multiple of itself, 12, we can drop the -12 (if you don't drop it you will end up with the same answer)
30k%12=0
Simplify your answer (divide both terms by 6):
5k%2=0
We need to find a value of k, where 5k%2=0 holds true:
if k=2: 10%2=0 (which is true)
Let x = some integer
So k=2x
Plug k back into an equation:
n = 30k - 2, where k=2x
n = 30(2x) - 2 = 60x - 2
Because we have now included every condition, and reduced our equation to only one independent variable, we have our answer:
n = 60x - 2, where x is some integer
if x=0: n=-2 (which all conditions hold true on)
if x=1: n=58 (which is the answer I provided up top)
if x=2: n=118
if x=3: n=178
if x=4: n=238
and so on and so forth
n = 60x - 2 is the same as the equation I provided above, it's just offset by 60.
Any number that can be divided by 2 and leave no remainder - for example, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, is an even number.
No answer is possible as any number divided by 9 must either be exactly divisible by 9 or leave a remainder less than 9.
33.3333
3 can be divided into any number, but if you mean a number that will leave no remainder than it's still no.
No, 85 is not an even number. Even numbers are integers that are exactly divisible by 2, meaning they leave no remainder when divided by 2. In the case of 85, when divided by 2, it leaves a remainder of 1, making it an odd number.
a number that can be divided and leave no remainder.
The remainder of any division MUST be smaller than the divisor. So no number divided by 10 or 7 can leave a remainder of 12. So review your question and post it when it makes sense.
The smallest whole number that can be divided by both 3 and 6 and leaves a remainder of 1 is 7.
92
A 2 digit number divided by a four digit number, such as 2345, will leave the whole 2-digit number as a remainder. It cannot leave a remainder of 1.
If the number is divided by 119, it cannot be a prime!
Any number that can be divided by 2 and leave no remainder - for example, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, is an even number.
5. To leave a remainder of 1 when divided by 2, the number must be odd. To leave a remainder of 2 when divided by 3, the number must also be two more than a multiple of 3. The multiples of 3 which are odd are 1 x 3, 3 x 3, 5 x 3, etc. The smallest odd multiple of three is 1 x 3 = 3 ⇒ required number is 3 + 2 = 5.
No answer is possible as any number divided by 9 must either be exactly divisible by 9 or leave a remainder less than 9.
All multiples of 60.
A prime number is a number that can only be divided by 1 or itself. A composite number is a number which can be divided by a number other than itself or 1 and not leave a remainder. 178 divided by 2, for example, equals 89 (89 + 89 = 178). Since 2 is not dividing 178 by 1 or by itself and leaves no remainder, it is a composite number.
6If a divisor of 51 leaves a quotient of 40, the dividend was 2040.If 2040 is divided by 17, the quotient left is 120.From superscot85: All very interesting but nothing to do with the question, which was about remainders, not quotients.Any number which leaves 40 on division by 51 must leave a remainder of 6 on division by 17, as 51 is 3 x 17 and 40 is (2 x 17) + 6.