The line must be solid if the inequality is strict (less than or greater than). It must be a dashed line if otherwise (less than or equal to, greater than or equal to).
If the inequality has a > or ≥ sign, you shade above the line. If the inequality has a < or ≤ sign, you shade below it. Obviously, just an = is an equation, not an inequality.
Pick a test point, (the origin is the most convenient unless the line of the inequality falls on it), and plug it into the same linear inequality. If the test point makes the inequality true, then shade that side of the line. If the test point makes the inequality false, then shade the opposite side of the line.
It depends upon the inequality. All points on the line are those which are equal, thus:If the inequality is (strictly) "less than" () then the points on the line are not included; howeverif the inequality is "less than or equals" (≤) or "greater than or equals" (≥) then the points on the line are included.
Whichever side contains all the numbers that satisfy the inequality. Generally, "greater than" points to the right side of the line or above it, and "less than" will lead to the left side or below it. But you have to be careful, and it would really help a lot if you understood the whole concept better than you presently do.
They are the same line.
If the line is undefined in a graphed inequality, it typically represents a vertical line, which corresponds to a vertical inequality such as ( x = a ). In this case, the inequality can be written as ( x < a ) or ( x > a ). The graph will shade to the left or right of the line, indicating the region that satisfies the inequality. Since the line itself is not included in the inequality, it is often represented with a dashed line.
Any compound inequality, in one variable, can be graphed on the number line.
If the inequality has a > or ≥ sign, you shade above the line. If the inequality has a < or ≤ sign, you shade below it. Obviously, just an = is an equation, not an inequality.
To determine the inequality graphed on a number line, you would need to identify the points marked on the line and the direction of any arrows or shading. If the line is shaded to the left of a point (for example, -2) with an open circle, it represents the inequality ( x < -2 ). If it’s shaded to the right with a closed circle, it would indicate ( x \geq -2 ). Please provide specific details about the graph for a more precise answer.
Basically. If the inequality's sign is < or ≤, then you shade the part under the line. If the inequality's sign is > or ≥, then you shade the part over the line.
Pick a test point, (the origin is the most convenient unless the line of the inequality falls on it), and plug it into the same linear inequality. If the test point makes the inequality true, then shade that side of the line. If the test point makes the inequality false, then shade the opposite side of the line.
Yes. Those lines are examples of when an inequality (≥ or ≤) is graphed.
To determine which side to shade in an inequality with two equations, first graph the lines represented by the equations. For each inequality, choose a test point not on the line (commonly the origin, if it's not on the line), and substitute its coordinates into the inequality. If the inequality holds true, shade the side of the line that includes the test point; if it does not hold true, shade the opposite side. Repeat this process for the other inequality, and the shaded regions will indicate the solution to the system.
To determine which side of a linear inequality to shade, select a test point that is not on the line (commonly the origin, (0,0), if it’s not on the line). Substitute the coordinates of that point into the inequality. If the inequality holds true, shade the side of the line that includes the test point; if it does not hold true, shade the opposite side.
Given an inequality, you need to decide whether you are required to shade the region in it is TRUE or FALSE. If you are given several inequalities, you would usually be required to shade the regions where they are false because shading is additive [shading + shading = shading] and you will be left with the unshaded region where all the inequalities are true.Next, select any point which is not of the line or curve for the inequality. Plug its coordinates into the inequality: it the result FALSE? If so, shade the region (relative to the line or curve) in which the point is found. If substituting the coordinates gives an inequality which is TRUE then shade the regions which is the other side of the line or curve.
To graph a two-variable linear inequality, first convert the inequality into an equation by replacing the inequality sign with an equal sign, which gives you the boundary line. Next, graph this line using a solid line for ≤ or ≥ and a dashed line for < or >. Then, determine which side of the line to shade by testing a point not on the line (usually the origin) to see if it satisfies the inequality. Finally, shade the appropriate region to represent all the solutions to the inequality.
Yes, graphed linear inequalities should be shaded to represent the solution set. The shading indicates all the points that satisfy the inequality. For example, if the inequality is (y > mx + b), the area above the line is shaded. If the inequality includes "less than or equal to" or "greater than or equal to," the line is typically solid; otherwise, it is dashed.