There are a lot of differences between people, so it's not surprising that there are some who are good at one subject but bad at another, even if they are closely related. Specifically regarding math and physics, there are some big differences. In high school math classes, you can generally memorize different steps or algorithms to solve problems that you would see on a test or quiz. Physics often times can require more critical thought based approaches when it comes to test and quiz problems. Also, the method of thinking is a little different between the two. Math is about abstract thinking of quantities and relationships. Physics is about describing the physical world, so in a way it is applying math concepts to the physical universe. Sometimes people who really enjoy and excel at the abstract thinking required for math don't perform as well applying those concepts to physical situations.
+++
IT may depend on how they were taught maths. If that was treated as a set of purely abstract puzzles then it would be hard to link, say, pure algebra or trigonometry to real life. Ideally, maths course exercises would use real formulae - with their uses stated.
=
To give a couple of examples: Without knowing the principles of algebra you won't be able to cope with numerical physics problems generally because you won't be able to re-arrange the standard formulae to suit the actual problem. If you find trigonometry hard you won't find electrical, optical or acoustic theory any easier.
=
It goes almost without saying of course that a mathematics syllabus needs to be clear and cohesive in the way it links different topics. You can't for example solve more advanced geometrical problems without knowing basic plane and solid geometry, trigonometry, circle formulae - and obviously algebra, by which the rest are all expressed, linked and manipulated. Used in physics or engineering, you can add graph properties, vectors and radians to that mix.
They do if they are good and don'y if they are not.
Check out the Related Links below - they have good on-line math programs for kids in grades 3-10.
Some people just don't believe it
Maths is fun for some people but some people ( e.g. me ) find math boring. Its probably because we dont like using our brain for stuff and we find calculators our math saviours
Neither, History is. It all depends how you define hard and what you're good at. To some people History is dead easy, but Math and Science are both hard whereas to me Maths is dead easy, science not quite so but History is hard.
Must be conceptual physics as physics has one language and that language is mathematics. I have never known a physicists that was not good at math.
Because they are based more on theory than numbers and facts
Yes. It is equally true that some people won't.
Yes, it is true. It is also true that some peope who are excellent at math will have a hard time with tieing their shoes and with pole-vaulting. Generally, however, in the majority of cases, most people who are excellent at math will also be quite good with Physics and Chemistry, if they're interested in it and willing to put forth a modicum of effort.
Each person has an individual learning style, and just because math and science tend to go hand in hand, that doesn't mean that people will automatically excel in both subjects.
Generally the opposite is true as chemistry and physics are heavily mathematically based
Chemistry, Physics and Engineering are not made up of just mathematics, there are a lot of understanding of the physics and chemistry concepts to do well in those courses too. Most people who are bad at math will have difficulty solving physics and chemistry problems (although they may understand the concepts). though they might be quite good at certain kinds of chemistry (synthetic organic chemistry, for example, which is more about memorization and less about mathematical skills). However, being good at math does not automatically mean you'll also be good at chemistry."Good at math" is also a somewhat vague term. You can be a whiz at simple arithmetic and still be horrible at analytical-type mathematics ("word problems") which are more similar to the kind of understanding of mathematics that's required in the physical sciences. So if someone doesn't have an understanding of the concepts, then they would have difficulty setting up the math equations (which will model the actual physics, chemistry etc.)
Not at at all, both fields are mathematics heavy.
You can't be good a everything.
physics attempts (and does a good job) to describe events observed in nature. Physics uses mathematics for some of the explanation. Gravitational attraction described by Newton used a math equation.
Because math, physics, chemistry and computer science are not the same things. Just because you're good at using maths doesn't necessarily mean you're not good at applying them. Theoretical and applied mathematics are widely considered very different fields.
That's hard to believe, unless it's conceptual science, then people need to be good at math to learn science