The statement "The Earth revolves around the Sun" is entirely true.
The below statement is false. The above statement is true. I am lying. I am lying when I say I am lying.
The information I have found contradicts the statement "not true," indicating that it is indeed false.
An objective statement is based on facts and can be proven true or false, while a subjective statement is based on personal opinions or feelings and cannot be proven true or false.
One classic example of a paradox is the "liar paradox," which revolves around a statement that cannot consistently be true or false. An example would be the statement "This statement is false." If the statement is true, then it must be false, but if it is false, then it must be true, creating a paradoxical situation.
The statement "p if and only if q" is true when both p and q are true, or when both p and q are false.
What reference are you using? I'm not entirely certain that the question is a true statement.
*matthew c. Wifey*
It depends entirely on the circumstances. It depends on: Who obtained the statement? How was the statement obtained? Why was it obtained? What was included in the statement? How old was the person who made the statement? From whom was the statement taken?
well that statement isn't entirely true
If the statement is false, then "This statement is false", is a lie, making it "This statement is true." The statement is now true. But if the statement is true, then "This statement is false" is true, making the statement false. But if the statement is false, then "This statement is false", is a lie, making it "This statement is true." The statement is now true. But if the statement is true, then... It's one of the biggest paradoxes ever, just like saying, "I'm lying right now."
Circular logic would be a statement or series of statements that are true because of another statement, which is true because of the first. For example, statement A is true because statement B is true. Statement B is true because statement A is true
In computing, this is an AND statement.
always true
always true
No, it is not considered slander if the statement is true.
Which statement is not true about characteristics of myths?Which statement is not true about characteristics of myths?
This is false. The statement would be true for regular polygons, but not all polygons are regular.