Yes, but it would be a pointless thing to do. The associative property is much more appropriate.
8*31 = 8*(30 + 1) which, using the distributive property, is= 8*30 + 8*1 = 240 + 8 = 248
the answer is 30
30+6
You don't need to use the distributive property. 3*17 = 51 so 30*17 = 510 Why invoke procedures that are not necessary?
35 x 3 = (30 x 3) + (5 x 3) = 90 + 15 = 105
Yes, but it would be a pointless thing to do. The associative property is much more appropriate.
The GCF of 24 and 30 is 6. The distributive property states that 24 x 30 = (20 x 30) + (4 x 30)
8*31 = 8*(30 + 1) which, using the distributive property, is= 8*30 + 8*1 = 240 + 8 = 248
23
the answer is 30
8*37 = 8*(30+7) = 8*30 + 8*7 [that is using the distributive property] = 240 + 56 = 296
30+6
45*60 can be written as (40+5)*60 and the distributive propoerty used to evaluate it. However, the associative property is much better 45*60 = 45*(2*30) = (45*2)*30 = 90*30 = 2700
6(5 + 11)
3(4 + 6) = 3 x 4 and 3 x 6 = 12 + 18 = 30
You don't need to use the distributive property. 3*17 = 51 so 30*17 = 510 Why invoke procedures that are not necessary?