Primary Data
An advantage of using primary data is that researchers are collecting information for the specific purposes of their study. In essence, the questions the researchers ask are tailored to elicit the data that will help them with their study. Researchers collect the data themselves, using surveys, interviews and direct observations (such as observing safety practices on a shop floor). answers to specific information
Secondary Data
There are several types of secondary data. They can include information from the Census, a company's health and safety records such as their injury rates, or other government statistical information such as the number of workers in different sectors across a country.
Both primary data and secondary data have their pros and cons. Primary data offers tailored information but tends to be expensive to conduct and takes a long time to process. Secondary data is usually inexpensive to obtain and can be analyzed in less time. However, because it was gathered for other purposes, you may need to tease out the information to find what you're looking for.
The type of data researchers choose can depend on many things including the research question, their budget, their skills and available resources. Based on these and other factors, they may choose to use primary data, secondary data - or both.
Secondary data is faster, cheaper, and less time consuming while primary data will be time consuming and the cost to conduct it is higher.
Primary data is very advantageous over secondary data in several types of ways. First of all, it is the actual thing, or the whole thing, depending on what primary data you are talking about. Primary data in the form of architecture is obviously much preferable over secondary data such as pictures, because it is there in front of you, and can be examined by your senses, not only seen by your eyes. Obviously secondary data also has advantages, such as being easier to obtain than primary data, but primary data is still a good way to obtain information.
Secondary data means information that has already been processed and collected by somebody else. Disadvantages are, for example: -The information can be biased -The information may not perfectly suit you research objective (information may be qualitative) These two main points are decisive and non-debatable enough.
The authors own words.
Secondary sources are better because your not learning the truth you have some story behind it and possible reasons that came to be.
Secondary data is faster, cheaper, and less time consuming while primary data will be time consuming and the cost to conduct it is higher.
Primary data is very advantageous over secondary data in several types of ways. First of all, it is the actual thing, or the whole thing, depending on what primary data you are talking about. Primary data in the form of architecture is obviously much preferable over secondary data such as pictures, because it is there in front of you, and can be examined by your senses, not only seen by your eyes. Obviously secondary data also has advantages, such as being easier to obtain than primary data, but primary data is still a good way to obtain information.
What is (the name?) (of) a secondary server (who) takes over in case of primary server failure? That would be a BDC. A Backup Domain Controller.
One advantage of secondary industries is that they almost always have access to the materials they need at reasonable costs from primary industries. Another advantage is not having to compete with larger, primary industries.
a primary source offers a firsthand account of an event. (apex)
a primary source offers a firsthand account of an event. (apex)
Primary research is considered reliable because it involves collecting firsthand data directly from the source, such as through experiments, surveys, or observations. This reduces the chance of errors or misinterpretations that can occur when using secondary sources. Additionally, primary research allows for greater control over the research process, ensuring that the data collected is specific to the research objectives.
One advantage of a secondary source over a primary source is that it may provide analysis, interpretation, or synthesis of information from multiple primary sources. This can offer a broader perspective or deeper understanding of a topic compared to individual primary sources.
Secondary data means information that has already been processed and collected by somebody else. Disadvantages are, for example: -The information can be biased -The information may not perfectly suit you research objective (information may be qualitative) These two main points are decisive and non-debatable enough.
Both the primary and secondary wires have an insulated coating that allows them to be wound over top of each other on an iron core. The AC current flowing in the primary creates a magnetic field in the iron that then induces a voltage in the secondary based on the turns ratio between the primary and secondary coils.
1) Flawless 2) Unique
· Secondary data is the most easily accessible data and saves the researcher the trouble of going through the tiresome process of collecting data personally. · Secondary data is readily available at cheap rates and is usually quite inexpensive. · Collecting secondary data and analysing it saves time and effort. · Secondary data is unobtrusive. It is easily available and the researcher can get it without much struggle. · Secondary data avoids data collection problems and it provides a basis for comparison. · It can be less expensive than gathering the data all over again. · This data type may allow the researcher to cover a wider geographic or temporal range. · Secondary data can allow for larger scale studies on a small budget. · Secondary data provides an opportunity for longitudinal analysis based on the previous waves of survey. · Secondary data is a good indicator for analyzing the social change overtime. · This type of data also provides an opportunity for cross-cultural analysis with fewer limits of time, cost and language. · Collecting secondary data leaves more time for making in depth data analysis. · Re-analysis of the same secondary data may offer different insights regarding the analysis by focusing on one variable or subgroup. · With secondary data the researchers might be able to test hypotheses they had not thought of, or examine the strengths of their arguments. · Secondary data may be available which is entirely appropriate and wholly adequate to draw conclusions and answer the question or solve the problem. Sometimes primary data collection simply is not necessary. · It is far cheaper to collect secondary data than to obtain primary data. For the same level of research budget a thorough examination of secondary sources can yield a great deal more information than can be had through a primary data collection exercise. · When the researcher has collected the secondary data, there is no need to repeat the field work necessary for the collection of data. · The time involved in searching secondary sources is much less than that needed to complete primary data collection. · Secondary sources of information can yield more accurate data than that obtained through primary research. This is not always true but where a government or international agency has undertaken a large scale survey, or even a census, this is likely to yield far more accurate results than custom designed and executed surveys when these are based on relatively small sample sizes. · It should not be forgotten that secondary data can play a substantial role in the exploratory phase of the research when the task at hand is to define the research problem and to generate hypotheses. The assembly and analysis of secondary data almost invariably improves the researcher's understanding of the marketing problem, the various lines of inquiry that could or should be followed and the alternative courses of action which might be pursued. · Often the secondary data provides valuable background for the research - for example, it enables users to judge whether a small sample they have gathered is typical of the national population. · Government survey organizations have considerable expertise and relatively massive resources, including the power to compel participation (e.g. in census-taking), so samples are more likely to be of large size and truly representative of the population. · Secondary sources help define the population. Secondary data can be extremely useful both in defining the population and in structuring the sample to be taken. For instance, government statistics on a country's agriculture will help decide how to stratify a sample and, once sample estimates have been calculated, these can be used to project those estimates to the population.