175 is composite because it can be broken down into smaller numbers.
Wiki User
∙ 15y agoWiki User
∙ 12y ago75 is composite. The factors of 75 are 1, 3, 5, 15, 25 and 75.
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago150 is composite; 150 is even, the only even prime is 2.
150 = 2 x 3 x 5²
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoNo, their GCF is 7.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago52 x 7 = 175
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago5 x 5 x 7 = 175
Wiki User
∙ 9y agoComposite: 5 x 5 x 5
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago175 = 5 x 5 x 7
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago5 and 7
It can be. 21 is relatively prime with 32.
No, 100 and 202 are not relatively prime. Relatively prime numbers only have the number 1 as a common factor. The number 1 is a common factor for them, but the number 2 is another common factor that they have, so they are not relatively prime.
37 is already prime. 3 x 31 = 93 No common prime factors, the GCF is 1.
209 is relatively prime (as is 211).
27 is not a prime number and i dont know about 117 but i dont think its a composite # * * * * * The person who gave the above answer has no understanding of "relative primes". Or primes, for that matter. Neither 8 nor 9 is a prime BUT 8 and 9 are relatively prime (or co-prime) because they have no factor in common. That is what relatively prime means. 117 is not a prime, even if the previous answerer thinks otherwise. 27 and 117 are not relatively prime because both are divisible by 3.
No, they are not relatively prime.
No, they are not relatively prime.
No, 63 and 74 are not relatively prime because they have a common factor of 1.
Yes, 143 and 63 are relatively prime because they have no prime factors in common.
ya they are relatively prime
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
No.
No, they are not.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
30 and 63 are relatively prime numbers. The factors of 30 are 1, 2, 3, 5, and 30, and the factors of 63 are 1, 7, 9, and 63. Two or more numbers are relatively prime if 1 is their only common factor.