0.000...1cm length on two sides. 19.999...9cm length on the other two.
If we restrict ourselves to whole numbers, then 1 x 14 will have the least possible area.
To find the least perimeter of a rectangle with a fixed area of 32 square feet, we can use the relationship between area and perimeter. For a rectangle, the area ( A = l \times w ) (length times width) and the perimeter ( P = 2(l + w) ). To minimize the perimeter while keeping the area constant, the rectangle should be a square. The side length of a square with an area of 32 ft² is ( \sqrt{32} ), which is approximately 5.66 ft. Thus, the least perimeter is ( 4 \times \sqrt{32} ), which is approximately 22.63 ft.
Yes.
No, it is not possible for a rectangle to have a perimeter of 46 and an area of 42 simultaneously. For a rectangle, the perimeter ( P ) is given by ( P = 2(l + w) ), and the area ( A ) is ( A = l \times w ), where ( l ) is the length and ( w ) is the width. Solving these equations shows that the dimensions needed for these values are inconsistent, meaning no such rectangle exists.
You might want to investigate the rectangle that measures [ 6 by 8 ].
52 ft
52 (13•4)
If we restrict ourselves to whole numbers, then 1 x 14 will have the least possible area.
For a fixed perimeter, the area will always be the same, regardless of how you describe the rectangle.
There is no relationship between the perimeter and area of a rectangle. Knowing the perimeter, it's not possible to find the area. If you pick a number for the perimeter, there are an infinite number of rectangles with different areas that all have that perimeter. Knowing the area, it's not possible to find the perimeter. If you pick a number for the area, there are an infinite number of rectangles with different perimeters that all have that area.
Assuming no fractional dimensions, least possible area would be a rectangle measuring 1cm x 9cm. Area increases to a maximum of 25 sq cm when shape is square, ie 5cm x 5cm.
To find the least perimeter of a rectangle with a fixed area of 32 square feet, we can use the relationship between area and perimeter. For a rectangle, the area ( A = l \times w ) (length times width) and the perimeter ( P = 2(l + w) ). To minimize the perimeter while keeping the area constant, the rectangle should be a square. The side length of a square with an area of 32 ft² is ( \sqrt{32} ), which is approximately 5.66 ft. Thus, the least perimeter is ( 4 \times \sqrt{32} ), which is approximately 22.63 ft.
47
Yes.
NO, because if you did it would be a square
No, it is not possible for a rectangle to have a perimeter of 46 and an area of 42 simultaneously. For a rectangle, the perimeter ( P ) is given by ( P = 2(l + w) ), and the area ( A ) is ( A = l \times w ), where ( l ) is the length and ( w ) is the width. Solving these equations shows that the dimensions needed for these values are inconsistent, meaning no such rectangle exists.
(p/4)2, where p is the perimeter.