52 ft
For a fixed perimeter, the area will always be the same, regardless of how you describe the rectangle.
47
There is no relationship between the perimeter and area of a rectangle. Knowing the perimeter, it's not possible to find the area. If you pick a number for the perimeter, there are an infinite number of rectangles with different areas that all have that perimeter. Knowing the area, it's not possible to find the perimeter. If you pick a number for the area, there are an infinite number of rectangles with different perimeters that all have that area.
NO, because if you did it would be a square
52 ft
If we restrict ourselves to whole numbers, then 1 x 14 will have the least possible area.
For a fixed perimeter, the area will always be the same, regardless of how you describe the rectangle.
47
There is no relationship between the perimeter and area of a rectangle. Knowing the perimeter, it's not possible to find the area. If you pick a number for the perimeter, there are an infinite number of rectangles with different areas that all have that perimeter. Knowing the area, it's not possible to find the perimeter. If you pick a number for the area, there are an infinite number of rectangles with different perimeters that all have that area.
Yes.
NO, because if you did it would be a square
Assuming no fractional dimensions, least possible area would be a rectangle measuring 1cm x 9cm. Area increases to a maximum of 25 sq cm when shape is square, ie 5cm x 5cm.
(p/4)2, where p is the perimeter.
42 square units.
You might want to investigate the rectangle that measures [ 6 by 8 ].
the area of a rectangleis 100 square inches. The perimeter of the rectangle is 40 inches. A second rectangle has the same area but a different perimeter. Is the secind rectangle a square? Explain why or why not.