One point on a logarithmic graph is not sufficient to determine its parameters. It is, therefore, impossible to answer the question.
Yes, the asymptote is x = 0. In order for logarithmic equation to have an asymptote, the value inside log must be 0. Then, 5x = 0 → x = 0.
Apex: false A logarithmic function is not the same as an exponential function, but they are closely related. Logarithmic functions are the inverses of their respective exponential functions. For the function y=ln(x), its inverse is x=ey For the function y=log3(x), its inverse is x=3y For the function y=4x, its inverse is x=log4(y) For the function y=ln(x-2), its inverse is x=ey+2 By using the properties of logarithms, especially the fact that a number raised to a logarithm of base itself equals the argument of the logarithm: aloga(b)=b you can see that an exponential function with x as the independent variable of the form y=f(x) can be transformed into a function with y as the independent variable, x=f(y), by making it a logarithmic function. For a generalization: y=ax transforms to x=loga(y) and vice-versa Graphically, the logarithmic function is the corresponding exponential function reflected by the line y = x.
Since the logarithmic function is the inverse of the exponential function, then we can say that f(x) = 103x and g(x) = log 3x or f-1(x) = log 3x. As we say that the logarithmic function is the reflection of the graph of the exponential function about the line y = x, we can also say that the exponential function is the reflection of the graph of the logarithmic function about the line y = x. The equations y = log(3x) or y = log10(3x) and 10y = 3x are different ways of expressing the same thing. The first equation is in the logarithmic form and the second equivalent equation is in exponential form. Notice that a logarithm, y, is an exponent. So that the question becomes, "changing from logarithmic to exponential form": y = log(3x) means 10y = 3x, where x = (10y)/3.
The graph of the function f(x) = 4, is the horizontal line to the x=axis, which passes through (0, 4). The domain of f is all real numbers, and the range is 4.
1024 = 45 Log1024 = Log45 = 5Log4
2x-2/x^2+3x-4
Yes, the asymptote is x = 0. In order for logarithmic equation to have an asymptote, the value inside log must be 0. Then, 5x = 0 → x = 0.
True
The horizontal asymptote for y = 0 when the degree is greater than the denominator, resulting in the inability to do long division.
asymptote
It is y = 0
y = x / (x^2 + 2x + 1) The horizontal asymptote is y = 0
It will have the same asymptote. One can derive a vertical asymptote from the denominator of a function. There is an asymptote at a value of x where the denominator equals 0. Therefore the 3 would go in the numerator when distributed and would have no effect as to where the vertical asymptote lies. So that would be true.
The only way I ever learned to find it was to think about it. The function f(x) = log(x) only exists of 'x' is positive. As 'x' gets smaller and smaller, the function asymptotically approaches the y-axis.
y = 4(2x) is an exponential function. Domain: (-∞, ∞) Range: (0, ∞) Horizontal asymptote: x-axis or y = 0 The graph cuts the y-axis at (0, 4)
y = 1. When the degree of your numerator is the same with the degree of your denominator, then y = the ratio of the leading coefficients of the numerator and denominator is the horizontal asymptote.
The point you desire, is (1, 0).The explanation follows:b0 = 1, for all b; thus,logb(1) = 0, for all b.On the other hand, logb(0) = -∞,which explains the vertical asymptote at the y-axis.