0
What else can I help you with?
How do you prove the ideal bandpass filter theorem with an inverse Fourier transform?
this question on pic
What models can you to prove that opposites combine to zero?
There is not much to prove there; opposite numbers, by which I take you mean "additive inverse", are defined so that their sum equals zero.
How do I prove the additive inverse is unique?
assume its not. make two cases show that the two cases are equal
What is the inverse of the statement below?
Answer this question… Which term best describes a proof in which you assume the opposite of what you want to prove?
Prove that the inverse of an invertible mapping is invertible?
Assume that f:S->T is invertible with inverse g:T->S, then by definition of invertible mappings f*g=i(S) and g*f=i(T), which defines f as the inverse of g. So g is invertible.
How do you prove the multiplicative inverse of a real number is unique?
Suppose p and q are inverses of a number x. where x is non-zero. Then, by definition, xp = 1 = xq therefore xp - xq = 0 and, by the distributive property of multiplication over subtraction, x*(p - q) = 0 Then, since x is non-zero, (p - q) = 0. That is, p = q. [If x = 0 then it does not have a multiplicative inverse.]
Does maximizing the scalar multiplication in matrix chain multiplication exhibit optimal substructure?
I think so. Copy and paste method could be used to prove this. But this is only my opinion.
Prove that the set of all real no is a group with respect of multiplication?
There are four requirements that need to be satisfied: A. Closure: For any two elements of the group, a and b, the operation a*b is also a member of the group. B. Associativity: For any three members of the group, a*(b*c) = (a*b)*c C. Identity: There exists an element in the group, called the identity and denoted by i, such that a*i = i*a for all a in the group. For real numbers with multiplication, this element is 1. D. Inverse: For any member of the group, a, there exists a member of the group, b, such that a*b = b*a = 1 (the identity). b is called the inverse of a and denoted by a-1.
Until the stagflation of the 1970s the Phillips curve seemed to prove an inverse relationship between inflation and what other variable?
Unemployment
How do you prove that the sum of a rational number and its additive inverse is zero?
I can give you an example and prove it: eg. take the rational no. 2......hence its additive inverse ie. its opposite no. will be -2 now lets add: =(2)+(-2) =2-2 =0 it means that the opposite no.s. get cancelled and give the answer 0 this is the same case for sum of a rational no. and its opposite no. to be ZERO
When you begin an indirect proof do you assume the inverse of what you intend to prove is true?
Yes, that's how it is done. Assuming the contrary should eventually lead you to some contradiction.
How do you prove that 1021 is the multiplicative inverse of 2.1?
A multiplicative inverse (or reciprocal) is a number 1/x which when multiplied by x yields the multiplicative identity (1). 2.1 = 2 and 1/10 = 21/10 21/10 x 10/21 = 210/210 = 1
