144
72,2
36,2,2
18,2,2,2
9,2,2,2,2
3,3,2,2,2,2
You cannot really make a factor tree for 7 because it is already a prime number.
I would assume so since 97 is a prime number.
Since 61 is already prime, a factor tree is not necessary. The prime factorization of 51 is 3 x 17, which wouldn't make much of a tree. More like a factor shrub.
13 is a prime number. It doesn't have a tree because its only prime factor is itself.
No you cannot. You might want to try the factor tree for 27.
13270 6635,2 1327,5,2
63 21,3 7,3,3
69 3,23
by using a prime factor tree
59 is a prime number and as such has only two factors: 1 and 59 A factor tree doesn't make sense for prime numbers since it would only have one branch: the number itself.
well it would be 51
Since 31 is a prime number, you would simply make two branches: one for 1, and one for 31.