No.
One hundred forty-four is divisible by 16. It is equal to 9.
6 + 4 + 6 = 16 1 + 6 = 7 → No; 646 is not divisible by 9 (there is a remainder of 7). ----------------------------------------- Only if the sum of the digits is divisible by 9 is the original number divisible by 9. Repeat the test on the sum until a single digit remains; only if this single digit is 9 is the original number divisible by 9, otherwise this single digit is the remainder when the original number is divided by 9.
For each given number, add the digits. If the sum comes to nine, then it is divisible by '9'. 234 ; 2 + 3 + 4 = 9 So is dividble by '9' 345 ; 3 + 4 + 5 = 12 = 1 + 2 = 3 Not divisible by '9' 567 ; 5 + 6 + 7 = 18 = 1 + 8 = 9 so is divisible by '9'.
To find out if a number is divisible by 9 u add the numbers together for example 9 plus 3 is 12 plus 4 is 16 plus 2 is 18 and 18 is divisible by 9 so so is tht large number:) the answer is 1048:))
NO. 1110 is not divisible by 9. A number is divisible by 9 if the sum of its digits is divisible by 9. 1110 = 1 + 1 + 1 + 0 = 3 (3 is not divisible by 9, thus, 1110 is not divisible by 9.)
8/9 They are both divisible by 2
513648 will diviide by... 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 16
The digital root (sum of digit) must be divisible by 9, and the number formed by the last 4 digits must be divisible by 16. The second requirement ensures that the number is divisible by 16.
Out of that list, just 5. ------------------------------------------------ To be divisible by 2 the last digit must be even, ie one of {0, 2, 4, 6, 8} The last digit is 5 which is not even (it is odd), so 745 is not divisible by 2 To be divisible by 3 the sum of the digits must also be divisible by 3; if the summing is repeated until a single digit remains, then the original number is only divisible by 3 if this single digit is divisible by 3, ie it is one of {3, 6, 9} 745 → 7 + 4 + 5 = 16 16 + 1 + 6 = 7 7 is not divisible by 3 (it is not one of {3, 6, 9}), so 745 is not divisible by 3 To be divisible by 5, the last digit must be 0 or 5 The last digit of 745 is 5 which is one of {0, 5}, so 745 is divisible by 5 To be divisible by 9 the sum of the digits must also be divisible by 9; if the summing is repeated until a single digit remains, then the original number is only divisible by 9 if this single digit is 9 (otherwise this single digit gives the remainder when the original number is divided by 9) 745 + 7 + 4 + 5 = 16 16 → 1 + 6 = 7 7 is not 9, so 745 is not divisible by 9 (the remainder is 7) To be divisible by 10 the last digit must be 0 The last digit of 745 is 5 which is not 0, so 745 is not divisible by 10. 745 is not divisible by 2, 3, 9, 10 745 is divisible by 5.
81: 8 + 1 = 9 which is divisible by 9, so 81 is divisible by 9 162: 1 + 6 + 2 = 9 which is divisible by 9, so 162 is divisible by 9 199: 1 + 9 + 9 = 19 → 1 + 9 = 10 → 1 + 0 = 1 which is not divisible by 9, so 199 is not divisible by 9. 1125: 1 + 1 + 2 + 5 = 9 which is divisible by 9, so 1125 is divisible by 9. So 199 is the only one not divisible by 9.
No it is not divisible by 9 .
All numbers divisible by 3 are NOT divisible by 9. As an example, 6, which is divisible by 3, is not divisible by 9. However, all numbers divisible by 9 are also divisible by 3 because 9 is divisible by 3.