no three is not a Prime number
A number cannot be relatively prime number by itself. It can only be relatively prime in the context of (relativeto) another number. That requires the two numbers not to have any prime factors in common.
Any prime number is relatively prime to any other prime number.
It can be. 16 is relatively prime with 25.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Two numbers are relatively prime if they have no factor in common. But a single number cannot be relatively prime.
no three is not a Prime number
A number cannot be "relatively prime" except in relation to another number. For example, 8 and 15 are relatively primebecause they contain no prime factors in common.
Yes, e.g. 3 and 5 are relatively prime, 27 (33) and 25 (52) are relatively prime...
They are not relatively prime. To be relatively prime, the only common factor they could have would be the number 1. Both also have the number 3 as a common factor, so they are not relatively prime.
A number cannot be relatively prime number by itself. It can only be relatively prime in the context of (relativeto) another number. That requires the two numbers not to have any prime factors in common.
An easy way to find a number relatively prime to another number is to find a nearby prime number. For example, 53 is relatively prime with 50. The following pairs are relatively prime. 3, 50 19, 50 37, 50 49, 50 50, 69 50, 201 50, 341 Any number that is not divisible by 2 or 5 will be relatively prime to 50.
No, 144 and 165 are not relatively prime. For them to be relatively prime, the number 1 could be their only common factor, but they also have 3 as a common factor.
The prime factors of 4 are 2 and 2. The prime factors of 9 are 3 and 3. They do not have any prime factors in common, so they are relatively prime.
Any prime number is relatively prime to any other prime number.
No, 100 and 202 are not relatively prime. Relatively prime numbers only have the number 1 as a common factor. The number 1 is a common factor for them, but the number 2 is another common factor that they have, so they are not relatively prime.
A number is relatively prime to another number or set of numbers when their GCF is 1.
No, 102 and 321 are not relatively prime. Relatively prime numbers only have the number 1 as a common factor. 102 and 321 have other common factors, like 3.