0
no it isn't because 4x2 =8.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Are 8 and 3 relatively prime?
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Is 8 and 118 relatively prime?
No.
Are 8 and 18 relatively prime?
no
Are 8 and 9 relatively prime?
Yes.
Is 8 12 and 15 relatively prime?
Yes, they are.
Are 7 and 21 relatively prime?
27 is not a prime number and i dont know about 117 but i dont think its a composite # * * * * * The person who gave the above answer has no understanding of "relative primes". Or primes, for that matter. Neither 8 nor 9 is a prime BUT 8 and 9 are relatively prime (or co-prime) because they have no factor in common. That is what relatively prime means. 117 is not a prime, even if the previous answerer thinks otherwise. 27 and 117 are not relatively prime because both are divisible by 3.
Is 9 and 8 relatively prime?
No neither of them are because 3x3=9 so it is not prime. 8 is not either because 2x4=8
Are 64 and 144 relatively prime?
No, 64 and 144 are not relatively prime. To be relatively prime, the only common factor they could have would be 1. They have other common factors such as 2, 4, 8 and 16.
Are 3 and 52 relatively prime?
A number cannot be "relatively prime" except in relation to another number. For example, 8 and 15 are relatively primebecause they contain no prime factors in common.
Is 384 and 945 relatively prime?
NO!!!! 384 is an even number, so it is not a prime, because it is divisble by '2' 945 is not prime because it can be divided by '5'.
Are 27 and 117 relatively prime?
No, they are not relatively prime.
Is 34 relatively prime?
It can be. 34 is relatively prime to 35. 34 is not relatively prime to 40.
