Some are, more are not.
A multiple of a natural number should be another natural number.
YES. Any even natural number is a multiple of 2.
The smallest multiple of a natural number n, is 1xn, or the number itself. We do not count 0xn which of course would be zero for every natural number n.
It could be: 4*7 = 28
Yes every natural no. a factor and multiple of 1
To find the smallest natural number that is a multiple of 13 and divisible by both 4 and 6, we first determine the least common multiple (LCM) of 4 and 6, which is 12. Next, we need to find the smallest multiple of 13 that is also a multiple of 12. The smallest multiple of 13 is 13 itself, but 13 is not divisible by 12. The smallest multiple of 13 that is also divisible by 12 is 156, as ( 156 = 13 \times 12 ). Therefore, the answer is 156.
Yes, if a number is a multiple of 8, it is also a multiple of 4. This is because 8 is itself a multiple of 4 (8 = 4 × 2). Therefore, any number that can be expressed as 8 times an integer will also be expressible as 4 times an integer, confirming that it is a multiple of 4 as well.
No - a smaller number can never be a multiple of a number, only a factor. But 4 is not a factor of 62, either.
There is no number that is "divisible by 4" and "not divisible by 4" at the same time - a number cannot be both a multiple of 4 and not a multiple of 4.
If last two digits of a number are divisible by 4 then number is a multiple of 4 for a number with more than 21 digit
There is no such number. Since 4 more than that number would be a higher multiple. And 4 more than THAT number would be a higher multiple still. And so on.
It is: 4*12 = 48