8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40 . . .
It could be: 4*7 = 28
Yes, if a number is a multiple of 8, it is also a multiple of 4. This is because 8 is itself a multiple of 4 (8 = 4 × 2). Therefore, any number that can be expressed as 8 times an integer will also be expressible as 4 times an integer, confirming that it is a multiple of 4 as well.
No - a smaller number can never be a multiple of a number, only a factor. But 4 is not a factor of 62, either.
It is: 4*12 = 48
If last two digits of a number are divisible by 4 then number is a multiple of 4 for a number with more than 21 digit
There is no number that is "divisible by 4" and "not divisible by 4" at the same time - a number cannot be both a multiple of 4 and not a multiple of 4.
There is no such number. Since 4 more than that number would be a higher multiple. And 4 more than THAT number would be a higher multiple still. And so on.
To determine if a number is a multiple of 4, check the last two digits of the number. If those two digits form a number that is divisible by 4, then the entire number is also a multiple of 4. For example, in the number 236, the last two digits are 36, and since 36 is divisible by 4, 236 is a multiple of 4.
Oh, dude, like, totally! So, to check if a number is a multiple of 4, you just need to see if it's divisible by 4 without any remainder. And guess what? 58 is not divisible by 4 because if you divide 58 by 4, you get 14 with a remainder of 2. So, in short, 58 is not a multiple of 4.
8 is a multiple and is not a perfect square.
The number 12 has 4 and 6 as factors so 12 is a multiple of 4 and 6.
There is no greatest multiple of any number: whatever multiple of 4 you say is the greatest I can always add 4 and get an even greater multiple.