answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

A set can be closed or not closed, not an individual element, such as zero.

Furthermore, closure depends on the operation under consideration.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why is zero not closed under the operation of whole numbers?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What operation are whole numbers closed under?

l think multiplication


Why is the set of positive whole numbers closed under subtraction?

The set of positive whole numbers is not closed under subtraction! In order for a set of numbers to be closed under some operation would mean that if you take any two elements of that set and use the operation the resulting "answer" would also be in the original set.26 is a positive whole number.40 is a positive whole number.However 26-40 = -14 which is clearly not a positive whole number. So positive whole numbers are not closed under subtraction.


Are the whole numbers closed under addition if so explain?

Yes because being closed under an operation means that when the operation is performed on members of a set the result is also a member of the set, and when any two [members of the set of] whole numbers are added together the result of the addition is also a whole number which is, unsurprisingly, a member of the set of whole numbers.


Why are odd integers closed under multiplication but not under addition?

The numbers are not closed under addition because whole numbers, even integers, and natural numbers are closed.


What is an example of whole numbers are closed under division?

The whole numbers are not closed under division! The statement is false since, for example, 2/3 is not a whole number.


Do 0 and 3 have closure for addition?

A set of numbers is considered to be closed if and only if you take any 2 numbers and perform an operation on them, the answer will belong to the same set as the original numbers, than the set is closed under that operation. If you add any 2 real numbers, your answer will be a real number, so the real number set is closed under addition. If you divide any 2 whole numbers, your answer could be a repeating decimal, which is not a whole number, and is therefore not closed. As for 0 and 3, the most specific set they belong to is the whole numbers (0, 1, 2, 3...) If you add 0 and 3, your answer is 3, which is also a whole number. Therefore, yes 0 and 3 are closed under addition


Is the set of whole numbers with 31 removed closed under the operation of multiplication?

No. Since -1 x -31 (= 31) would not be in the set.


Why do whole number require an extension?

The set of whole numbers is not closed under division (by non-zero whole numbers).


Is the set of whole numbers closed under subtraction?

It depends on your definition of whole numbers. The classic definition of whole numbers is the set of counting numbers and zero. In this case, the set of whole numbers is not closed under subtraction, because 3-6 = -3, and -3 is not a member of this set. However, if you use whole numbers as the set of all integers, then whole numbers would be closed under subtraction.


Is the set of whole numbers are closed under multiplication?

If you can never, by multiplying two whole numbers, get anything but another whole number back as your answer, then, YES, the set of whole numbers must be closed under multiplication.


Are the whole numbers closed under addition?

Yes.


Are whole numbers closed under the operations of addition?

Yes. When you add any whole numbers you get another whole number. That is what closed means in this context. The answer is still a whole number.