answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

It depends on your definition of whole numbers. The classic definition of whole numbers is the set of counting numbers and zero. In this case, the set of whole numbers is not closed under subtraction, because 3-6 = -3, and -3 is not a member of this set. However, if you use whole numbers as the set of all integers, then whole numbers would be closed under subtraction.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Why, yes, it is.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

Yes, it is.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is the set of whole numbers closed under subtraction?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Algebra

True or False The set of whole numbers is closed under subtraction Why?

False. The set of whole numbers is not closed under subtraction. Closure under subtraction means that when you subtract two whole numbers, the result is also a whole number. However, this is not always the case with whole numbers. For example, subtracting 5 from 3 results in -2, which is not a whole number.


Is the set of integers closed under subtraction?

yes, because an integer is a positive or negative, rational, whole number. when you subject integers, you still get a positive or negative, rational, whole number, which means that under the closure property of real numbers, the set of integers is closed under subtraction.


Is the set of whole numbers are closed under multiplication?

If you can never, by multiplying two whole numbers, get anything but another whole number back as your answer, then, YES, the set of whole numbers must be closed under multiplication.


Do 0 and 3 have closure for addition?

A set of numbers is considered to be closed if and only if you take any 2 numbers and perform an operation on them, the answer will belong to the same set as the original numbers, than the set is closed under that operation. If you add any 2 real numbers, your answer will be a real number, so the real number set is closed under addition. If you divide any 2 whole numbers, your answer could be a repeating decimal, which is not a whole number, and is therefore not closed. As for 0 and 3, the most specific set they belong to is the whole numbers (0, 1, 2, 3...) If you add 0 and 3, your answer is 3, which is also a whole number. Therefore, yes 0 and 3 are closed under addition


Is it true that no irrational numbers are whole numbers?

Yes, no irrational numbers are whole numbers.

Related questions

Why is the set of positive whole numbers closed under subtraction?

The set of positive whole numbers is not closed under subtraction! In order for a set of numbers to be closed under some operation would mean that if you take any two elements of that set and use the operation the resulting "answer" would also be in the original set.26 is a positive whole number.40 is a positive whole number.However 26-40 = -14 which is clearly not a positive whole number. So positive whole numbers are not closed under subtraction.


Is the whole number closed under subtraction?

If you interpret "whole numbers" as "integers", then yes. If you interpret "whole numbers" as "non-negative integers", then no.


What is an example of a counterexample for the difference of two whole numbers is a whole number?

There is no counterexample because the set of whole numbers is closed under addition (and subtraction).


What is always true about whole numbers?

They form a closed set under addition, subtraction or multiplication.


What is the set of whole numbers closed by?

If you mean the set of non-negative integers ("whole numbers" is a bit ambiguous in this sense), it is closed under addition and multiplication. If you mean "integers", the set is closed under addition, subtraction, multiplication.


What do interger's allow you to do that whole numbers do not?

Integers are closed under subtraction, meaning that any subtraction problem with integers has a solution in the set of integers.


Is the set of integers closed under subtraction?

yes, because an integer is a positive or negative, rational, whole number. when you subject integers, you still get a positive or negative, rational, whole number, which means that under the closure property of real numbers, the set of integers is closed under subtraction.


Is closure exist for whole numbers under subtraction and division for integers?

Whole numbers subtraction: YesDivision integers: No.


True or False The set of whole numbers is closed under subtraction Why?

False. The set of whole numbers is not closed under subtraction. Closure under subtraction means that when you subtract two whole numbers, the result is also a whole number. However, this is not always the case with whole numbers. For example, subtracting 5 from 3 results in -2, which is not a whole number.


Why are odd integers closed under multiplication but not under addition?

The numbers are not closed under addition because whole numbers, even integers, and natural numbers are closed.


What is an example of whole numbers are closed under division?

The whole numbers are not closed under division! The statement is false since, for example, 2/3 is not a whole number.


Why do whole number require an extension?

The set of whole numbers is not closed under division (by non-zero whole numbers).