It was probably the first humanoid who learned to take a measure of the size of his hunting party or the number of prey.
Chat with our AI personalities
Nobody invented it. It was a consequence of the definition of numbers. Nobody invented it. It was a consequence of the definition of numbers. Nobody invented it. It was a consequence of the definition of numbers. Nobody invented it. It was a consequence of the definition of numbers.
Yes, no irrational numbers are whole numbers.
The average of 33 consecutive whole numbers is 58, what is the smallest of these whole numbers? The answer is 42
there are a lot of examples of whole numbers 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. . .
It depends on your definition of whole numbers. The classic definition of whole numbers is the set of counting numbers and zero. In this case, the set of whole numbers is not closed under subtraction, because 3-6 = -3, and -3 is not a member of this set. However, if you use whole numbers as the set of all integers, then whole numbers would be closed under subtraction.