No, 45 and 84 are not relatively prime.
The LCM of 32 and 45 is 1440. 32 and 45 have no common factors. We call this relatively prime. When you have relatively prime numbers, their LCM is their product.Since 32 and 45 share no common factors, the LCM would be 32*45 = 1440.
Two numbers are relatively prime if the only factor they have in common is 1. Example: 12 and 17 are relatively prime because they have only 1 as a common factor. 12 and 21 are not relatively prime because they have 1 and 3 as common factors.
No. They both have 17 as a prime factor - 374 = 2 x 11 x 17
A prime number has only 2 factors which are 1 and itself. Composite numbers are everything else except 1 and 0. 1 and 0 are neither prime, nor composite. 45 and 102 are both composite.
No, 45 and 84 are not relatively prime.
Yes, 45 and 64 are relatively prime because they do not share any prime factors.
Yes, 13 and 17 are relatively prime.
17 and 68 are not relatively prime because they have 17 as a common factor.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
39 and 45 are not relatively prime because they have 3 as a common factor. Relatively prime numbers have no common factor greater than 1.
To be relatively prime requires another number, and the highest common factor between 17 and that number must be 1. 17 is relatively prime to all numbers which are not multiples of 17 (since 17 is a prime number).
Since the GCF of 45 and 56 is 1, they are relatively prime.
No, they are not.
No, they are not.
Yes.