Best Answer

To be relatively prime requires another number, and the highest common factor between 17 and that number must be 1.

17 is relatively prime to all numbers which are not multiples of 17 (since 17 is a Prime number).

Q: Is 17 relatively prime

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

17 and 68 are not relatively prime because they have 17 as a common factor.

Yes, they are relatively prime.

Yes.

In order to determine if something is relatively prime, you must have something to compare it to. 180 is relatively prime to, say, 17, but not to 3. This is because 180 does not share any factors with 17, but it does share factors with 3 (namely, 3). (This does not take into consideration the factor 1)

No, they are not relatively prime.

Related questions

Yes, 13 and 17 are relatively prime.

17 and 68 are not relatively prime because they have 17 as a common factor.

Yes, they are relatively prime.

Yes, they are relatively prime.

Yes.

Yes.

In order to determine if something is relatively prime, you must have something to compare it to. 180 is relatively prime to, say, 17, but not to 3. This is because 180 does not share any factors with 17, but it does share factors with 3 (namely, 3). (This does not take into consideration the factor 1)

Two numbers are relatively prime if the only factor they have in common is 1. Example: 12 and 17 are relatively prime because they have only 1 as a common factor. 12 and 21 are not relatively prime because they have 1 and 3 as common factors.

No. They both have 17 as a prime factor - 374 = 2 x 11 x 17

7 and 17 are both primes numbers. The means that to find the LCM we need multiply them. The LCM of 7 and 17 is 7x17 which is 119. If two numbers are prime, then they are also relatively prime and in general the way to find the LCM of relatively prime number is to multiply them together.

HELL NAW even if you're old srry

No, they are not relatively prime.