arithmetic sequence this is wrong
I believe the answer is: 11 + 6(n-1) Since the sequence increases by 6 each term we can find the value of the nth term by multiplying n-1 times 6. Then we add 11 since it is the starting point of the sequence. The formula for an arithmetic sequence: a_{n}=a_{1}+(n-1)d
There is no simple answer because there is no simple rule for primes: it is certainly NOT an arithmetic progression.
There are infinitely many possible answers. If the missing number is the second in the sequence, it could be part of an arithmetic progression and so equal 10.4, or it could be in geometric progression and so would be 4, or harmonic progression which would give 1/0.65 = 1.54, approx. Furthermore, he missing number cold be the first or third in the sequence.
A single number, such as 2726101400 does not define a sequence.
origin of arithmetic sequence
It is an arithmetic sequence for which the index goes on and on (and on).
An arithmetic sequence is a list of numbers which follow a rule. A series is the sum of a sequence of numbers.
That's an arithmetic sequence.
It is the start of an arithmetic sequence.
Arithmetic
Any pair of numbers will always form an arithmetic sequence.
No.
The 90th term of the arithmetic sequence is 461
No. An 'arithmetic' sequence is defined as one with a common difference.A sequence with a common ratio is a geometricone.
It is an arithmetic sequence if you can establish that the difference between any term in the sequence and the one before it has a constant value.
No, the Fibonacci sequence is not an arithmetic because the difference between consecutive terms is not constant