The answer depends on the data source. Exchange rates are usually accurate to 6 significant digits.
If two decimal numbers have x and y digits after the decimal point respectively, then their product has (x + y) digits after the decimal point.
Yes, it can.
.625 is a terminating decimal. A decimal is considered terminating if it has a finite number of digits after the decimal point. In the case of .625, there are only three digits after the decimal point, making it a terminating decimal.
It is a terminating decimal.
I think it's a repeating decimal.
Digits after (to the right of) the decimal point contribute to the accuracy of the number, not its magnitude (or size). So only the digits to the left of the decimal point contribute to the magnitude. Digits after (to the right of) the decimal point contribute to the accuracy of the number, not its magnitude (or size). So only the digits to the left of the decimal point contribute to the magnitude. Digits after (to the right of) the decimal point contribute to the accuracy of the number, not its magnitude (or size). So only the digits to the left of the decimal point contribute to the magnitude. Digits after (to the right of) the decimal point contribute to the accuracy of the number, not its magnitude (or size). So only the digits to the left of the decimal point contribute to the magnitude.
You must add 9 digits (or 12 digits, depending on the country) after the decimal point, and eliminate the decimal point. Thus (assuming the "short scale") you get: 53,620,000,000.You must add 9 digits (or 12 digits, depending on the country) after the decimal point, and eliminate the decimal point. Thus (assuming the "short scale") you get: 53,620,000,000.You must add 9 digits (or 12 digits, depending on the country) after the decimal point, and eliminate the decimal point. Thus (assuming the "short scale") you get: 53,620,000,000.You must add 9 digits (or 12 digits, depending on the country) after the decimal point, and eliminate the decimal point. Thus (assuming the "short scale") you get: 53,620,000,000.
The digits from 0 to 9, and the decimal point (or comma, depending on the country).The digits from 0 to 9, and the decimal point (or comma, depending on the country).The digits from 0 to 9, and the decimal point (or comma, depending on the country).The digits from 0 to 9, and the decimal point (or comma, depending on the country).
One way is to multiply the numbers ignoring the decimal point. If the first multiplicand has d1 digits after the decimal point, and the second has d2 digits after the decimal point, then their product has (d1 + d2) digits after the decimal point.An alternative for the second stage is to estimate the answer to determine where the decimal point should go.
If two decimal numbers have x and y digits after the decimal point respectively, then their product has (x + y) digits after the decimal point.
If the two decimal numbers have x and y digits after the decimal points, then the product has (x + y) digits after the decimal point.
Yes, it can.
.625 is a terminating decimal. A decimal is considered terminating if it has a finite number of digits after the decimal point. In the case of .625, there are only three digits after the decimal point, making it a terminating decimal.
If it ever ends, then it is.If there are no digits after the decimal point, it's an integer.
When using front-end estimation, we add or subtract the front digits, and then adjust for a more accurate estimation by estimating the sum of the digits to the right of the decimal point.
Only if the final digit, after the decimal point, is zero.
You need to add up the number of digits to the right of the decimal to find the number of digits in the answer. If the first factor has 2 digits to the right of the decimal point and the second factor has 3, the final answer will have 5 digits to the right of the decimal point.