Rational numbers and Real Numbers. The multiplicative inverses of integers are not integers.
Because 1. Positive integers are greater than negative integers, and 2. Division by a positive number preserves the order.
No, integers are a subset of rational numbers.
Rational numbers are integers and fractions
One.
1. No.The Natural numbers are the positive integers (sometimes the non-negative integers).Rational numbers are numbers that can be expressed as the quotient of two integers (positive or negative). All Natural numbers are in the set of Rational numbers. 2. No. Natural numbers are usually defined as integers greater than zero. A Rational number is then defined simply as a number that can be expressed as an integer divided by a natural number. (This definition includes all rational numbers, but excludes division by zero.)
Rational.
-5 is an integer and a rational number. Integers can be positive or negative. Rational numbers can be expressed as a fraction of integers.
That is a rational number, as are all of the integers.
Integers are rational numbers, whether they are positive or negative.
Because 1. Positive integers are greater than negative integers, and 2. Division by a positive number preserves the order.
Yes. All positive and negative integers are rational numbers.
a rational number is any number that can be expressed as p/q where p and q are both integers. Since integers can most definitely be positive-- you might know them as the set of Natural numbers-- then yes, a rational number can be positive.
Yes, the number 88 is rational. A "rational number" is any number that can be expressed as a ratio of integers. That is A/B where A and B are integers, and not zero. Rational numbers include all positive and negative integers and all positive and negative fractions (and mixed numbers when expressed as a fraction).
The intersection of integers and rational numbers is the set of integers. Integers are whole numbers that can be positive, negative, or zero, while rational numbers are numbers that can be expressed as a ratio of two integers. Since all integers can be expressed as a ratio of the integer itself and 1, they are a subset of rational numbers, making their intersection the set of integers.
Yes. Both the additive inverse and the multiplicative inverse would be irrational in this case. For example, if a and b are integers, a/b is rational by definition; in this case, b/a would also be rational, being the ratio of two integers.
No. It is rational, AND it is an integer. Integers are the numbers - positive, negative, or zero - which have no decimals.
Only if the integer is a perfect square.