Assuming you're asking about an electrical transformer...
Electricity meets resistance as it flows threw the transformer. Some of the flow of the energy is converted to heat due to the resistance and you get less electrical energy out than you put in. Think of electrical resistance as similar to friction between two objects, say rubbing your hands together quickly and generating heat.
Due to the some energy losses...
There re Eddy current loses in the coil
nothing has 100% efficiency.
There 25 primes less than 100: 2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19,23,29,31,37,41,43,47,53,59,61,67,71,73,79,83,89,97.
100% equals the number. Less than 100% is less than the number. Greater than 100% is greater than the number.
The largest integer equal to -100 is -100. The largest integer less than -100 is -101.
There are 49 even numbers less than 100, but only the number 2 is an even prime number less than 100.
why is the efficiency of a calorimeter less than 100%
No. A perfectly frictionless machine could have an efficiency of 100%. Anything less perfect must have can efficiency less than 100%.
It is always less than 1 or 100%.It is always less than 1 or 100%.It is always less than 1 or 100%.It is always less than 1 or 100%.
The Law of Conservation of Energy states that energy can't be created or destroyed. Thus, efficiency is 1 (i.e., 100%) if there is a perfect energy conversion. Since this is usually not the case, and some energy is wasted, the efficiency of most energy conversions is less than 100% (or less than a factor of 1).
Efficiency as a percent is output/input * 100%12000/15000 * 100% = 80% efficiency which makes sense, because it takes more work (input) than it give out (output). So the efficiency should be less than 100%.
input
It is always less than 100% Theoretical machines can have efficiencies of 100% but in practice there is always some energy loss Efficiencies of more than 100% are not allowed by the laws of thermodynamics!
It is the output energy compared to the input energy. This will always be less than 100%
For an 'ideal' transformer operating at full load, the answer is yes. But, 'real' transformers are a little less than 100% efficient so, in practice, the input power will slightly exceed the output power. In most circumstances, for the purpose of calculating primary and secondary currents, we can assume 100% efficiency.
The efficiency is always less than one because some of the energy is always useless for what you want. Most wasted energy eventually turns into heat. therefore the efficiency is like a percentage with 1 being 100% a device can't be 100% efficient as some energy is wasted. To work out the efficiency of a device you need to do the total useful energy produced divided by the total energy that is inputted into the device
An efficiency factor of 1 (or 100% efficiency) is not possible due to losses that cannot be reduced to zero. These losses take the form of friction, heat loss etc.
In theory, work output might be equal to work input; that would be 100% efficiency. In practice, the output of a machine will be less than the input; i.e., some energy will be lost.In theory, work output might be equal to work input; that would be 100% efficiency. In practice, the output of a machine will be less than the input; i.e., some energy will be lost.In theory, work output might be equal to work input; that would be 100% efficiency. In practice, the output of a machine will be less than the input; i.e., some energy will be lost.In theory, work output might be equal to work input; that would be 100% efficiency. In practice, the output of a machine will be less than the input; i.e., some energy will be lost.