No
11, 4, 8
With a triangle the sum of its 2 smaller sides must be greater than its longest side and so if 7 and 9 are its smaller sides then its longest side could be 10
No because it does not comply with Pythagoras; theorem if the lengths were 10, 24 and 26 then it would be.
When two shapes have proportionally equivalent lengths and angles, they are geometrically similar. For example, take a triangle with sides of length 3, 4, and 5. Another triangle with side lengths 6, 8, and 10 would be geometrically similar to it because its angles are the same and its side lengths are proportional.
No
Yes.
11, 4, 8
you can it is simple 5+7=12 and the longer lenght of the tringle is less then 12 but greatter then 10 so its true
No because the sum of the smaller lengths must be greater than the longest length
The last side length could be between 4 units and 10 units inclusive.
Information about the lengths of two sides of a triangle is insufficient to determine its area.
With a triangle the sum of its 2 smaller sides must be greater than its longest side and so if 7 and 9 are its smaller sides then its longest side could be 10
No because it does not comply with Pythagoras; theorem if the lengths were 10, 24 and 26 then it would be.
When two shapes have proportionally equivalent lengths and angles, they are geometrically similar. For example, take a triangle with sides of length 3, 4, and 5. Another triangle with side lengths 6, 8, and 10 would be geometrically similar to it because its angles are the same and its side lengths are proportional.
Yes and it will be a scalene triangle
If you mean sides of 10, 12 and 16 then yes a triangle be constructed because the sum of its 2 smaller sides is greater than its longest side.