ASA is not a triangle, it is a method of proving that two triangles are congruent.
ASA refers to showing that if two angles and a side (Angle-Side-Angle) of one triangle are the same measures as the corresponding angles and side of another triangle, then the two triangles are congruent.
Since the three angles sum to 180 degrees, if two of them in one triangle are equal to the corresponding angles in the second triangle, then the third set of angles must also be equal. Consequently, ASA is equivalent to AAS and SAA.
That is NOT The case with two sides and an angle, where it must be the included angle that is equal.
ASA
Since ASA is a congruence postulate and congruence implies similarity, then the answer is : yes.
ASA or Angle Side Angle differs from the AAS in that the order of the sides or angles are stated is the same as they are labeled on a triangle. Just because the letters are shifted doesn't make them different. There are three angles on a triangle and there are only two stated so the two stated cannot be assigned to angles with a side in between them for AAS, or a side at either side for ASA.
To be congruent, the three angles of a triangle must be the same and the three sides must be the same. If triangles TRS and WUV meet those conditions, they are congruent.
You need SAS (side angle side), SSS (side side side), ASA (angle side angle), AAS (angle angle side) or CPCTC (corresponding parts of congruent angles are congruent)
ASA
Since ASA is a congruence postulate and congruence implies similarity, then the answer is : yes.
The Angle Side Angle postulate( ASA) states that if two angles and the included angle of one triangle are congruent to two angles and the included side of another triangle, then these two triangles are congruent.
To show that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle XYZ by the Angle-Side-Angle (ASA) criterion, we need to establish that one pair of angles and the included side between them are equal in both triangles. Specifically, if we already have one pair of equal angles (∠A = ∠X) and the included side (AB = XY), we would also need to show that the second pair of angles (∠B = ∠Y) is equal. With these conditions satisfied, triangle ABC would be congruent to triangle XYZ by ASA.
To show that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle XYZ by the ASA (Angle-Side-Angle) criterion, we need to establish that two angles in triangle ABC are congruent to two angles in triangle XYZ, along with the side that is included between those angles being congruent. Specifically, if we have ∠A ≅ ∠X, ∠B ≅ ∠Y, and side AB ≅ XY, then the triangles can be concluded as congruent by ASA. Thus, we would need to confirm the congruence of these angles and the included side.
If a side and two angles at either end of it (Angle-Side-Angle = ASA) of one triangle are the same measure as that of another triangle, then the two triangles are congruent. In fact, it does not have to be the angles at the ends of the sides in question since two angles being equal means that the third pair of angle will also be equal. So as long as the ASA are in corresponding order, the triangles will be congruent.
To determine which overlapping triangles are congruent by the Angle-Side-Angle (ASA) postulate, you need to identify two angles and the included side of one triangle that correspond to two angles and the included side of another triangle. If both triangles share a side and have two pairs of equal angles, then they are congruent by ASA. For a specific example, if triangles ABC and DEF share side BC and have ∠A = ∠D and ∠B = ∠E, then triangles ABC and DEF are congruent by ASA.
Angle-Side-Angle is also called ASA. ASA formula is used to determine congruency. It means that 2 triangles are congruent if 2 angles and the included side of one triangle are congruent to 2 angles and the included side of the other triangle.
ASA or Angle Side Angle differs from the AAS in that the order of the sides or angles are stated is the same as they are labeled on a triangle. Just because the letters are shifted doesn't make them different. There are three angles on a triangle and there are only two stated so the two stated cannot be assigned to angles with a side in between them for AAS, or a side at either side for ASA.
The only Two Triangle congruence shortcuts that do not prove congruence are: 1.AAA( Three pairs of angles in a triangle) & 2.ASS or SSA(If the angle is not in between the two sides like ASA.
We cannot determine without seeing the data for PRS & QRS. My guess though would be ASA Though it could also be SSS
I assume "throemand" is your fail at spelling "theorem and".The theorem states that if two angles and the included side of one triangle are congruent to the corresponding parts of another triangle, then the triangles are congruent.