0
What else can I help you with?
What else would be need to be congruent to show that triangle JKL congruent MNO by AAS?
To show that triangle JKL is congruent to triangle MNO by the Angle-Angle-Side (AAS) theorem, you need to establish that two angles and the non-included side of triangle JKL are congruent to two angles and the corresponding non-included side of triangle MNO. Specifically, you would need to verify that one of the angles in triangle JKL is congruent to one of the angles in triangle MNO, and that the side opposite the angle in triangle JKL is congruent to the corresponding side in triangle MNO. This would complete the necessary conditions for AAS congruence.
What else would need to be congruent to show that triangle abc congruent to xyz by asa?
To show that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle XYZ by the ASA (Angle-Side-Angle) criterion, we need to establish that two angles in triangle ABC are congruent to two angles in triangle XYZ, along with the side that is included between those angles being congruent. Specifically, if we have ∠A ≅ ∠X, ∠B ≅ ∠Y, and side AB ≅ XY, then the triangles can be concluded as congruent by ASA. Thus, we would need to confirm the congruence of these angles and the included side.
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc is congruent to def by the aas theorem?
To show that triangles ABC and DEF are congruent by the AAS (Angle-Angle-Side) theorem, you need to establish that two angles and the non-included side of one triangle are congruent to the corresponding two angles and the non-included side of the other triangle. If you have already shown two angles congruent, you would need to prove that one of the sides opposite one of those angles in triangle ABC is congruent to the corresponding side in triangle DEF. This additional information will complete the criteria for applying the AAS theorem.
What else would need to be congruent to show that ABCis congruent toXYZ by SAS?
The answer depends on what is already known about the two triangles.
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc is congruent to def by ASA?
"What else" implies there is already something that is congruent. But since you have not bothered to share that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer. no correct
What else would you to need to show triangle efg congruent to triangle hij by sss?
D). Eg = hj
What else would need to be congruent to show that triangle ABC equals triangle XYZ by aas?
Nicki Minaj
What else would need to be congruent to show that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle XYZ by Angle Side Angle?
Without seeing the picture, I can't tell what's already known to be congruent, so there's no way I can figure out what 'else' is needed.
What else would need to be congruent to show that triangle abc equals xyz by sas?
bh=ws
What else would be need to be congruent to show that triangle JKL congruent MNO by AAS?
To show that triangle JKL is congruent to triangle MNO by the Angle-Angle-Side (AAS) theorem, you need to establish that two angles and the non-included side of triangle JKL are congruent to two angles and the corresponding non-included side of triangle MNO. Specifically, you would need to verify that one of the angles in triangle JKL is congruent to one of the angles in triangle MNO, and that the side opposite the angle in triangle JKL is congruent to the corresponding side in triangle MNO. This would complete the necessary conditions for AAS congruence.
What else would need to be congruent to show that triangle abc congruent to xyz by asa?
To show that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle XYZ by the ASA (Angle-Side-Angle) criterion, we need to establish that two angles in triangle ABC are congruent to two angles in triangle XYZ, along with the side that is included between those angles being congruent. Specifically, if we have ∠A ≅ ∠X, ∠B ≅ ∠Y, and side AB ≅ XY, then the triangles can be concluded as congruent by ASA. Thus, we would need to confirm the congruence of these angles and the included side.
What else would need to be congruent to show that triangle abc is congruent to xyz by SAS?
"What else" implies there is already something that is congruent. But since you have not bothered to share that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer.
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc is congruent to def by the aas theorem?
To show that triangles ABC and DEF are congruent by the AAS (Angle-Angle-Side) theorem, you need to establish that two angles and the non-included side of one triangle are congruent to the corresponding two angles and the non-included side of the other triangle. If you have already shown two angles congruent, you would need to prove that one of the sides opposite one of those angles in triangle ABC is congruent to the corresponding side in triangle DEF. This additional information will complete the criteria for applying the AAS theorem.
What else would need to be congruent to show that jkl mno by aas?
AAS is equal to angle-angle-side, and is descriptive of a triangle. JKL and MNO would be the sides and angles of a triangle. The two sides must be congruent to the opposite angle.
Does a triangle have to congruent angles?
yes, only the isosceles triangle has two congruent angles. But triangles don't need any congruent angles
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc congruent xyz by SAS?
__ - __ AC = XZ = is the similar sign
What else would need to be congruent to show that abc def by asa?
Angle "A" is congruent to Angle "D"
