0
There was no need for a zero in their system. We have 9 numbers plus the zero symbol. We add a zero on to the end of a number to convert it to tens and two zeros to convert it to hundreds and so on. The Romans simply had different symbols for tens and hundreds. For example we would write 1, 10, 20, 40, 50, 100 and 200 but the same numbers as Roman numerals would be I, X, XX, XL, L, C and CC, done quite simply with no need for a zero. In the middle ages monks, who still used Roman numerals and wrote in Latin, began to used the symbol N to represent zero (from the Latin Nullae meaning nothing).
In general, the number zero did not have its own Roman numeral, but a primitive form (nulla) was known by medieval computists (responsible for calculating the date of Easter). They included zero (via the Latin word nulla meaning "none") as one of nineteen epacts, or the age of the moon on March 22. The first three epacts were nullae, xi, and xxii (written in minuscule or lower case). The first known computist to use zero was Dionysius Exiguus in 525. Only one instance of a Roman numeral for zero is known. About 725, Bede or one of his colleagues used the letter N, the initial of nullae, in a table of epacts, all written in Roman numerals. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_numerals
In roman numerals there is no zero. Click on the link below for more information.
Yes but it's never used because the positional place value of Roman numerals are self evident.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What represented zero in ancient Chinese numerals?
There was no zero in ancient Chinese numerals. The ancient Chinese number system was not a positional system, so there was no need for a zero.
What are the weaknesses of the Egyptian numeral system?
there is difficulty in the mathematical opperations there is no zero
Did Romans have a symball for zero?
Yes the Romans did have a symbol for zero and it looked like the letter N but they didn't need it in their numeral system for positional place value purposes because the positional place value of Roman numerals are self evident.
Why roman system is not a place value system?
Because they didn't create it that way. There is no real reason they need one. I guess they decided they didn't want one or didn't think about that idea yet. There is no place value system in roman numerals because they had numeral for zero.
In ancient times was the zero important?
Zero was not in use in ancient times. It was not introduced into Europe until the 12th century and then it came from Arabia.
In Greek numerals is there a symbol for zero?
No, the Ancient Greek number system did not use zero as a place value, or number for that matter.
How do you say zero in Aramaic?
Aramaic has no word for zero, since that value does not occur in the Aramaic numeral system, nor in Roman numerals or in ancient Hebrew or in ancient Egyptian.
Who introduced zero in the number system?
The 0 figure had its origins from the ancient Indian system of numeracy which was later called the Hindu-Arabic numeral system.
Zero is used in our mathematics?
Yes now zero is essential for positional place value purposes in today's Hindu-Arabic numeral system but it wasn't needed in the ancient Roman numeral system because the positional place value of its numerals were self evident.
What system of numerals do not have zero?
the roman numeral system
What if the number system did not contain 0 how would that effect people?
They would have to revert back to the ancient Roman numeral system which didn't need a zero symbol.
What are the uses of Zero in the Egyptian numeral system?
as far as i know the Egyptian numeral system doesn't use zero. sorry i couldn't be more help ;)
What is the Roman numerals for zero?
there is no roman numeral for itAnother answer: The Romans had no numeral to represent zero because there was no need for a zero in their system. We have 9 numbers plus the zero symbol. We add a zero on to the end of a number to convert it to tens and two zeros to convert it to hundreds and so on. The Romans simply had different symbols for tens and hundreds. For example we would write 1, 10, 20, 40, 50, 100 and 200 but the same numbers as Roman numerals would be I, X, XX, XL, L, C and CC, done quite simply with no need for a zero. In the middle ages monks, who still used Roman numerals and wrote in Latin, began to used the symbol N to represent zero (from the Latin Nullae meaning nothing).
Which Roman Numeral does not exist?
The Roman Numeral system did not have a way to represent zero.
Which numbering system should not used zero?
The Roman numeral system
In which numbering system zero doesn't exist?
Roman numeral system.
What is the difference of ancient numerals from roman numerals?
A zero symbol was used in some ancient numeral systems for positional place value purposes whereas the Roman numeral system didn't need a zero symbol because the positional place value of the numerals are self evident as for example DV is equivalent to 505.
