no, it simply multiplies the quotient by 1 (the multiplicative identity).
When dividing by decimals, the easiest way to do this is to modify the question so that there is no longer a decimal in the divisor. Just as with equivalent fractions, if we multiply the dividend and the divisor by the same number, we do not actually change the question. For example, consider 1 divided by 0.2 (ie 1 / 0.2) Start by multiplying the dividend and the divisor by 10 to remove the decimal in the divisor. This changes the problem to 10 / 2. We can now evaluate the division to give 10/2=5. In your specific case where you want to divide by 3.14, you would times both the dividend and the divisor by 100 to remove the decimal in the divisor. For example 6.28 / 3.14 = 628 / 314 = 2
Change 6/5 to a mixed number.1. Divide the numerator by the denominator: 6 ÷ 5 = (quotient) 1 (remainder) 12. Write the mixed number: (quotient) 1 1/5 (remainder/divisor)Change 18/7 to a mixed number.1. Divide the numerator by the denominator: 18 ÷ 7 = (quotient) 2 (remainder) 42. Write the mixed number: (quotient) 2 4/7 (remainder/divisor)
Because not to do so would change the relationship between them 3.45/12.3 = 345/1230 = 0.2805 (approx) If you multiplied the dividend by 100 and the divisor by ten (doing just enoguh to remove the decimal places) then the relationship (the ratio) changes 345/ 123 = 2.8049 (approx)
It is dividing the dividend by the divisor untilthere is no remainder; orthe digits in the quotient start repeating; oryou have reached a satisfactory degree of accuracy.The last bullet is because some fractions will not start repeating for a long time. Most primes will take as many digits as the prime itself: for example, 1/29 has a repeating string which is 29-digits long.
We have to put the dividend in the numerator and divisor in the denominator. For e.g, 4 by 8=4/8
Fist divide then divisor by the dividend. Then do the same to the other fraction which then equals your quotient. Hope I helped ya! :D
When dividing by decimals, the easiest way to do this is to modify the question so that there is no longer a decimal in the divisor. Just as with equivalent fractions, if we multiply the dividend and the divisor by the same number, we do not actually change the question. For example, consider 1 divided by 0.2 (ie 1 / 0.2) Start by multiplying the dividend and the divisor by 10 to remove the decimal in the divisor. This changes the problem to 10 / 2. We can now evaluate the division to give 10/2=5. In your specific case where you want to divide by 3.14, you would times both the dividend and the divisor by 100 to remove the decimal in the divisor. For example 6.28 / 3.14 = 628 / 314 = 2
Moving the decimal point one place to the right is the same as multiplying both, he numerator and the denominator by 10. That is, you are effectively multiplying by 10/10 which equals 1. And since multiplication by 1 does not change the result, it is OK to do that. Similarly, moving two palces to the right is multiplying by 100/100. Similarly moving left.
Change 6/5 to a mixed number.1. Divide the numerator by the denominator: 6 ÷ 5 = (quotient) 1 (remainder) 12. Write the mixed number: (quotient) 1 1/5 (remainder/divisor)Change 18/7 to a mixed number.1. Divide the numerator by the denominator: 18 ÷ 7 = (quotient) 2 (remainder) 42. Write the mixed number: (quotient) 2 4/7 (remainder/divisor)
Because not to do so would change the relationship between them 3.45/12.3 = 345/1230 = 0.2805 (approx) If you multiplied the dividend by 100 and the divisor by ten (doing just enoguh to remove the decimal places) then the relationship (the ratio) changes 345/ 123 = 2.8049 (approx)
It is dividing the dividend by the divisor untilthere is no remainder; orthe digits in the quotient start repeating; oryou have reached a satisfactory degree of accuracy.The last bullet is because some fractions will not start repeating for a long time. Most primes will take as many digits as the prime itself: for example, 1/29 has a repeating string which is 29-digits long.
We have to put the dividend in the numerator and divisor in the denominator. For e.g, 4 by 8=4/8
The Answers community requires more information for this question. Please edit your question to include more context.I suspect that the question refers to a quotient of 23 with a remainder of 5. That is not enough information. It is also necessary to know what the divisor was.
An improper fraction is one in which the numerator n is greater than the divisor d. Divide n by d to give a quotient q and remainder r. Then n/d = q r/d.
A stock drops on the ex-dividend date because on that day, the stock no longer includes the right to receive the upcoming dividend payment. This change in the stock's value reflects the value of the dividend being paid out to shareholders.
Yes.
not regularly