No because as for example 23 is a Prime number but 32 is a composite number
The sum of any two-digit number and the number formed by reversing the digits is always divisible by 11. This is because when you add a two-digit number to its reverse, the result will always be a multiple of 11. This is because the difference between the original number and its reverse is always a multiple of 9, and when you add two multiples of 9, the sum will always be a multiple of 11.
any of the following numbers works ...12, 23, 34, 45, 56, 67, 78, 89,
No, and you do not even if you reverse them.
38
Alberto
No, reversing the order of the digits of a two-digit prime number does not always result in a prime number.
The sum of any two-digit number and the number formed by reversing the digits is always divisible by 11. This is because when you add a two-digit number to its reverse, the result will always be a multiple of 11. This is because the difference between the original number and its reverse is always a multiple of 9, and when you add two multiples of 9, the sum will always be a multiple of 11.
No. For example, reversing 23 gets 32.
any of the following numbers works ...12, 23, 34, 45, 56, 67, 78, 89,
the result is always even
No, and you do not even if you reverse them.
19
When multiplying numbers with significant digits, count the total number of significant digits in each number being multiplied. The result should have the same number of significant digits as the number with the fewest significant digits. Round the final answer to that number of significant digits.
As a result of the rule that you use the definition of the term - such as significant digits - when finding them for a number.
38
It always is a negative number. The result will be the sum of the two digits with a minus sign in front of it, eg, (-4) - (+7) = -4 - 7 = -11.
This follows from the property that the set of integers is closed under addition. This means that any two integers, when added together, must always result in a whole number.