Without knowing what the numbers are, I would suggest taking the mean of the given numbers.
decimal
You turn the decimal into a fraction. Then you can find the equivalent fraction.
There is no such thing as a "next" decimal number. Numbers are infinitely dense: that is, between any two numbers there are infinitely many numbers. Therefore, given any number claiming to be next after 65, there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and that number - The smallest of these has a better claim at being next. But there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and this number.There is no such thing as a "next" decimal number. Numbers are infinitely dense: that is, between any two numbers there are infinitely many numbers. Therefore, given any number claiming to be next after 65, there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and that number - The smallest of these has a better claim at being next. But there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and this number.There is no such thing as a "next" decimal number. Numbers are infinitely dense: that is, between any two numbers there are infinitely many numbers. Therefore, given any number claiming to be next after 65, there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and that number - The smallest of these has a better claim at being next. But there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and this number.There is no such thing as a "next" decimal number. Numbers are infinitely dense: that is, between any two numbers there are infinitely many numbers. Therefore, given any number claiming to be next after 65, there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and that number - The smallest of these has a better claim at being next. But there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and this number.
To convert a fraction into a decimal divide the numerator (top number) by the denominator (bottom number). When the fraction is as simple as possible (no common factor between the numerator and denominator other than 1) and the denominator has any prime factor other than 2 and 5, the resulting decimal will be recurring.
Using ordinary long division, divide the fraction's numerator by its denominator.
0.675689 is a terminating decimal between the two given numbers and its equivalent fraction is 675689/1000000.
decimal
There are an infinite amount of decimal numbers between these given numbers
You turn the decimal into a fraction. Then you can find the equivalent fraction.
If you are trying to compare a given decimal to a given fraction, you can divide the fraction out and compare the result to the given decimal. For example, 1/2 = 1 divided by 2. = 0.5 3/4 = 3 divided by 4. = 0.75
If the decimal is terminating or repeating then it can be written as a fraction. Decimal representations which are non-terminating and non-repeating cannot be expressed as a fraction.
1.800000000001 is one of infinitely many decimals between the two given numbers.
If the decimal stops or repeats, it can be written as a fraction. If it goes on randomly forever, it can't.
7/100
You can get a repeating fraction with any denominator whose prime factors include some numbers other than 2 or 5. This is because 2 and 5 are the prime factors of 10 - the base of our decimal system. In this case, the denominator can be any of: 3, 6, 7, 9
There are infinitely many decimals between any two given (different) numbers. If you want the number exactly in the middle, take the average of the two numbers.
There is no such thing as a "next" decimal number. Numbers are infinitely dense: that is, between any two numbers there are infinitely many numbers. Therefore, given any number claiming to be next after 65, there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and that number - The smallest of these has a better claim at being next. But there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and this number.There is no such thing as a "next" decimal number. Numbers are infinitely dense: that is, between any two numbers there are infinitely many numbers. Therefore, given any number claiming to be next after 65, there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and that number - The smallest of these has a better claim at being next. But there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and this number.There is no such thing as a "next" decimal number. Numbers are infinitely dense: that is, between any two numbers there are infinitely many numbers. Therefore, given any number claiming to be next after 65, there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and that number - The smallest of these has a better claim at being next. But there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and this number.There is no such thing as a "next" decimal number. Numbers are infinitely dense: that is, between any two numbers there are infinitely many numbers. Therefore, given any number claiming to be next after 65, there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and that number - The smallest of these has a better claim at being next. But there are infinitely many numbers between 65 and this number.