There is a method that looks similar to long division, but is more complicated.
However, a simple method is to bracket multiples of 100.
Suppose you want the square root of 37.
In terms of perfect squares 62 = 36 < 37 < 49 = 72
so that 6 < sqrt(37) < 7
Now look at 3700 and consider perfect squares of the integers between 10*6 = 60 and 10*7 = 70.
You will find that 602 = 3600 < 3700 < 3721 = 612
Next look at 370000 and the perfect squares of integers in the range 10*60 = 600 and 10*61 = 610
This gives 6082 = 369664 < 370000 < 370881 = 6092
The following step gives
This gives 60822 = 36990724 < 37000000 < 37002889 = 60832
So, to 2 decimal places, the answer is 6.08.
Or, on the grounds that the second inequality is much closer, you could say that the answer to 3 dp is 6.083. Note however, that that arguement does not always work.
The above method can be continued indefinitely - provided you can calculate the bracketing squares. And that can be done manually well beyond the range of an ordinary calculator. Or even standard spreadsheets.
Methods, such as Newton Raphson, are not much help because they require you to calculate the square root as part of the process.
1,290 is not a perfect square. The approximate square root is ± 35.916569992136
The square root of a negative number is not real.
Because 9 is a perfect square - which means that its square root is an integer. 3 is not a perfect square.
Not sure what you mean by "perfect square root".A "perfect square" is the square of a whole number; if that's what you mean, yes, it's the square of the number 1.
No. Such a number is referred to as a perfect square. The closest perfect square to 23 is 25, the square root of which is 5.
1,290 is not a perfect square. The approximate square root is ± 35.916569992136
For a number to be a perfect square, the number's square root has to be a whole number. 9 is a perfect square because its square root is a whole number, 3. If the square root of the number is a decimal, then it is not a perfect square. For example, 13 does not divide evenly so it not a perfect square.
A perfect square root is where the square root of a number equals another whole number. For example, the square root of 144 is 12. 12 is a whole number thus 144 is a perfect square root.
Yes, a perfect square is a number that has an integer square root.
Sometimes the square root of a positive number can be irrational, as in the square root of 2 (which is a non-perfect square number), but sometimes it is a rational number, as in the square root of 25 (which is a perfect square number).
The square root of a negative number is not real.
Because 9 is a perfect square - which means that its square root is an integer. 3 is not a perfect square.
Not sure what you mean by "perfect square root".A "perfect square" is the square of a whole number; if that's what you mean, yes, it's the square of the number 1.
No. Such a number is referred to as a perfect square. The closest perfect square to 23 is 25, the square root of which is 5.
The square root of 762 cannot be simplified by the product rule. It is also not a perfect square. The best that we can do is to approximate it, since it is an irrational number, which means that it cannot be written as a fraction. Therefore, the square root of 762 is approximately 27.6
* Its square root is a whole #. Example: 16 is a perfect square. Its square root is 4. 17 is not a perfect square. Its square root is around 4.123105626
The square root of 79 is approximately 8.89. Rounding to the nearest whole number, the approximate square root of 79 is 9.