No. There are roughly pi * 10 million seconds in a year, which is around 30 times more than the number of microseconds in a second.
There are 1,000,000,000 nanoseconds in a second. There are 1x60x60x24x365.25 or 31,557,600 seconds in a year. So nanoseconds in a second is over 60 times more
One microsecond is one one-millionth of a second, or 0.000001 seconds. Being that it is considerably shorter than a second, the length of a second cannot be contained within this span of time.
40,000 times as fast
. Normal refill time is less than 2 seconds.
It's less. There are 604800 seconds in a week
no. micro second is less than milli second.
There are 1,000,000,000 nanoseconds in a second. There are 1x60x60x24x365.25 or 31,557,600 seconds in a year. So nanoseconds in a second is over 60 times more
500 nanoseconds is a much shorter amount of time than 1000 microseconds 500 nanoseconds = 0.5 microseconds 1000 microseconds = 1,000,000 nanoseconds
Microseconds are shorter than milliseconds
Distance covered in nth second means the distance covered in that particular second . It cannot be more than the distance covered in n seconds which means the distance covered in a total time of n seconds.
the minuim second for lupang hinirang is 52 and the max is 57. you should not go more than 57 seconds when singing lupang hinirang. its a fault when you sing more than 57 seconds
The likely word sought is "seconds" (more than one second, or additional servings).
the 3 second rule is when your team has the ball, you can't stand in the key area for more than three seconds if you stay in there more than 3 seconds you will be called up by the ref for "3 seconds" hope this helps
it floats around and then dissolves. i think
Of course,offense or defense can get three second violations!
less than a second if a mirror a second
That depends on its health. Less than a second - healthy. More than a couple of seconds - unhealthy.