Yes, for example:
| x | < 0
(since the absolute value of any expression is always positive or zero)
or:
(x+5)2 < 0
(Similar to the above: since the square of any expression is also positive or zero).
Nothing will solve an expression. You need an equation (an equality or an inequality) beofre a solution of any kind is possible. Tha means you need something on both sides of the equality (or inequality) sign.
It is not possible to "solve" b+815 because it is an expression - not an equation or inequality.
If you're given the inequality and the equation, then the way to prove that they have the same solution is to solve each one and show that the solutions are the same number. Don't strain yourself, though. An inequality and an equation never have the same solution.
To create an inequality that takes at least two steps to solve with the solution ( x < 5 ), you can use the following inequality: ( 3x - 7 < 8 ). To solve it, first add 7 to both sides to get ( 3x < 15 ), and then divide both sides by 3 to arrive at ( x < 5 ).
The inequality ( x - 1837 ) is incomplete as it lacks a relational operator (like <, >, ≤, or ≥). If you meant to solve ( x - 1837 > 0 ), then the solution would be ( x > 1837 ). If you meant ( x - 1837 < 0 ), the solution would be ( x < 1837 ). Please provide the complete inequality for a specific solution.
Solve the inequality and enter your solution as an inequality comparing the variable to the solution. -33+x<-33
x>-9
Nothing will solve an expression. You need an equation (an equality or an inequality) beofre a solution of any kind is possible. Tha means you need something on both sides of the equality (or inequality) sign.
x>5
It is not possible to "solve" b+815 because it is an expression - not an equation or inequality.
If you're given the inequality and the equation, then the way to prove that they have the same solution is to solve each one and show that the solutions are the same number. Don't strain yourself, though. An inequality and an equation never have the same solution.
Substitute the values of the variables into the inequality. If the inequality is true then they are a solution, if not, they are not.Substitute the values of the variables into the inequality. If the inequality is true then they are a solution, if not, they are not.Substitute the values of the variables into the inequality. If the inequality is true then they are a solution, if not, they are not.Substitute the values of the variables into the inequality. If the inequality is true then they are a solution, if not, they are not.
To create an inequality that takes at least two steps to solve with the solution ( x < 5 ), you can use the following inequality: ( 3x - 7 < 8 ). To solve it, first add 7 to both sides to get ( 3x < 15 ), and then divide both sides by 3 to arrive at ( x < 5 ).
The inequality ( x - 1837 ) is incomplete as it lacks a relational operator (like <, >, ≤, or ≥). If you meant to solve ( x - 1837 > 0 ), then the solution would be ( x > 1837 ). If you meant ( x - 1837 < 0 ), the solution would be ( x < 1837 ). Please provide the complete inequality for a specific solution.
No, you can only simplify an expression. To solve for a variable, it must be in an equation.
There can be no solution because there is just an expression - no equation nor inequality.
I don't see any numbers below.One method to solve this is to replace each of the numbers in the inequality, do the calculations, and then check whether the inequality is satisfied. Another method is to get the general solution for the inequality, then check with each of the numbers.